Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2017
Person-centered endoscopy safety checklist: Development, implementation, and evaluation.
Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade.Human resources for health · 2020Pooled it
- Factors influencing the patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound: a Swedish cross-sectional study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Non-technical skills in the management of endoscopic adverse events.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Crew resource management and threat and error management improve team communication in endoscopy: a prospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Patients' Experiences of Diagnostic and Therapeutic High-Resolution Endoscopy in Treating Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions: A Qualitative Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Implementation of a Customized Safety Checklist in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the Importance of Team Time Out-A Dual-Center Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Checklist feasibility and impact in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.Endoscopy international open · 2021Review
- Patient participation in gastrointestinal endoscopy - From patients' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo describe the development and implementation of a person-centered endoscopy safety checklist and to evaluate the effects of a "checklist intervention".
methodsThe checklist, based on previously published safety checklists, was developed and locally adapted, taking patient safety aspects into consideration and using a person-centered approach. This novel checklist was introduced to the staff of an endoscopy unit at a Stockholm University Hospital during half-day seminars and team training sessions. Structured observations of the endoscopy team's performance were conducted before and after the introduction of the checklist. In addition, questionnaires focusing on patient participation, collaboration climate, and patient safety issues were collected from patients and staff.
resultsA person-centered safety checklist was developed and introduced by a multi-professional group in the endoscopy unit. A statistically significant increase in accurate patient identity verification by the physicians was noted (from 0% at baseline to 87% after 10 mo,
conclusionThe intervention led to increased patient identity verification by physicians - a patient safety improvement. Clear evidence of enhanced person-centeredness or team work was not found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.