Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358792›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2018

Novel soybean-based high protein bar rich in isoflavones improves insulin sensitivity in diabetic Wistar rats.

Wanessa Costa Silva Faria, Morenna Alana Giordani, Ariadny da Silva Arcas, Daniela Fernanda Lima Carvalho Cavenaghi, Adriana Paiva de Oliveira, Jacqueline Fiuza Dos Santos, Wander Miguel Barros

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mathematical Modeling and Optimization ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wanessa Costa Silva Faria1Food Science and Technology Post-Graduate Program, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso (IFMT), Cuiabá Campus - Bela Vista, Av. Juliano da Costa Marques s/n, Bela Vista, Cuiabá, MT 78050-560 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1656-5498
Morenna Alana Giordani2Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, University Campus of Sinop, Avenida Alexandre Ferronato, 1200, Setor Industrial, Sinop, MT 78557-267 Brazil.
Ariadny da Silva Arcas3Food Engineering Program, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso (IFMT), Cuiabá Campus - Bela Vista, Av. Juliano da Costa Marques s/n, Bela Vista, Cuiabá, MT 78050-560 Brazil.
Daniela Fernanda Lima Carvalho Cavenaghi1Food Science and Technology Post-Graduate Program, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso (IFMT), Cuiabá Campus - Bela Vista, Av. Juliano da Costa Marques s/n, Bela Vista, Cuiabá, MT 78050-560 Brazil.
Adriana Paiva de Oliveira1Food Science and Technology Post-Graduate Program, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso (IFMT), Cuiabá Campus - Bela Vista, Av. Juliano da Costa Marques s/n, Bela Vista, Cuiabá, MT 78050-560 Brazil.
Jacqueline Fiuza Dos Santos4Food Science and Technology Program, Department of Food and Nutrition, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá Campus. Av. Fernando Correa da Costa 2367, Boa Esperança, Cuiabá, MT 78060-900 Brazil.
Wander Miguel Barros1Food Science and Technology Post-Graduate Program, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Mato Grosso (IFMT), Cuiabá Campus - Bela Vista, Av. Juliano da Costa Marques s/n, Bela Vista, Cuiabá, MT 78050-560 Brazil.
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of whey protein substitution with isolated soy protein in protein bar (PB) formulations at 25% (PB2), 50% (PB3), or 75% (PB1) weight/weight on the proximate and mineral composition, sensory, and antidiabetic properties. Sensory evaluation was conducted within diabetic (DB) and non-diabetic (NDB) consumers by preference ranking and acceptance test. The formulations were analysed in terms of moisture, ash, protein, lipid, carbohydrates, fibers and mineral content. The consumers did not distinguish the formulations by preference ranking test. However, the acceptability test showed a rating of 9 most frequent for PB1 (36.30%), followed by PB2 and PB3 (both 34.09%), among DB consumers. The PB1 and PB3 showed higher content of total, soluble and insoluble fibers and, PB 2 presented higher carbohydrate content. Potassium, sodium and calcium showed the highest mineral content in the formulations. PB3 was assessed for glycaemic and lipidemic control in diabetics and non-diabetics female Wistar rats, for this 20% of PB was added in the ration consumed ad libitum, besides, the rats received 100 mg/kg b. w. by gavage daily. The treatment did not reduce significantly fasting glucose, lipid profile, or peripheral glucose disposal in DB or NDB rats. However, it significantly improved insulin tolerance test values in diabetic rats. The results suggest that the formulations showed good acceptance and potentially ameliorate insulin resistance both in control group and in animal model of type II diabetes.

Indexed as

Animal models of diabetesInsulin sensitivityIsolated soy proteinSensory evaluationType-2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID29358792
PMCPMC5756179
OpenAlexW2765897588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.