Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358495›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2018

History of CRISPR-Cas from Encounter with a Mysterious Repeated Sequence to Genome Editing Technology.

Yoshizumi Ishino, Mart Krupovic, Patrick Forterre

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed, 521 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yoshizumi IshinoUnité de Biologie Moléculaire du Gène Chez les Extrêmophiles, Département de Microbiologie, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France ishino@agr.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Mart KrupovicUnité de Biologie Moléculaire du Gène Chez les Extrêmophiles, Département de Microbiologie, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5486-0098
Patrick ForterreUnité de Biologie Moléculaire du Gène Chez les Extrêmophiles, Département de Microbiologie, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur · FRKyushu University · JPUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas systems are well-known acquired immunity systems that are widespread in archaea and bacteria. The RNA-guided nucleases from CRISPR-Cas systems are currently regarded as the most reliable tools for genome editing and engineering. The first hint of their existence came in 1987, when an unusual repetitive DNA sequence, which subsequently was defined as a CRISPR, was discovered in the

Indexed as

GenomicsArchaeaBacteriaClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEscherichia coliGene EditingGenome, BacterialHistory, 20th CenturyHumansarchaeacasposongenome editingrepeated sequence

Identifiers

PMID29358495
PMCPMC5847661
OpenAlexW2784807861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.