Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358440›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2018

Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities.

Meghan Winters, Michael Branion-Calles, Suzanne Therrien, Daniel Fuller, Lise Gauvin, David G T Whitehurst, Trisalyn Nelson

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. COVID-19 street reallocation in mid-sized Canadian cities: socio-spatial equity patterns.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meghan WintersFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael Branion-CallesFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Suzanne TherrienFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Daniel FullerSchool of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Lise GauvinCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRHCUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
David G T WhitehurstFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Trisalyn NelsonSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

Funding

CIHR #365011CIHR #377333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBicycling is promoted as a transportation and population health strategy globally. Yet bicycling has low uptake in North America (1%-2% of trips) compared with European bicycling cities (15%-40% of trips) and shows marked sex and age trends. Safety concerns due to collisions with motor vehicles are primary barriers.To attract the broader population to bicycling, many cities are making investments in bicycle infrastructure. These interventions hold promise for improving population health given the potential for increased physical activity and improved safety, but such outcomes have been largely unstudied. In 2016, the City of Victoria, Canada, committed to build a connected network of infrastructure that separates bicycles from motor vehicles, designed to attract people of 'all ages and abilities' to bicycling.This natural experiment study examines the impacts of the City of Victoria's investment in a bicycle network on active travel and safety outcomes. The specific objectives are to (1) estimate changes in active travel, perceived safety and bicycle safety incidents; (2) analyse spatial inequities in access to bicycle infrastructure and safety incidents; and (3) assess health-related economic benefits. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is in three Canadian cities (intervention: Victoria; comparison: Kelowna, Halifax). We will administer population-based surveys in 2016, 2018 and 2021 (1000 people/city). The primary outcome is the proportion of people reporting bicycling. Secondary outcomes are perceived safety and bicycle safety incidents. Spatial analyses will compare the distribution of bicycle infrastructure and bicycle safety incidents across neighbourhoods and across time. We will also calculate the economic benefits of bicycling using WHO's Health Economic Assessment Tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study received approval from the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics (study no. 2016s0401). Findings will be disseminated via a website, presentations to stakeholders, at academic conferences and through peer-reviewed journal articles.

Indexed as

CitiesEnvironmentAdolescentAdultAgedBicyclingCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignSpatial AnalysisSurveys and Questionnairesactive transportationbicyclingnatural experimentpopulation healthsafety

Identifiers

PMID29358440
PMCPMC5781157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.