Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358437›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Developing a dementia-specific preference--based quality of life measure (AD-5D) in Australia: a valuation study protocol.

Tracy A Comans, Kim-Huong Nguyen, Brendan Mulhern, Megan Corlis, Li Li, Alyssa Welch, Susan E Kurrle, Donna Rowen, Wendy Moyle, Sanjeewa Kularatna and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lack of cross-cultural validity of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30.Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Tracy A ComansThe Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kim-Huong NguyenNHMRC's Partnership Centre on Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Brendan MulhernCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Megan CorlisNHMRC's Partnership Centre on Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Li LiMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Alyssa WelchThe Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Susan E KurrleNHMRC's Partnership Centre on Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Donna RowenHealth Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Wendy MoyleMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sanjeewa KularatnaInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Julie RatcliffeNHMRC's Partnership Centre on Dealing with Cognitive and Related Functional Decline in Older People, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Griffith University · AUNational Health and Medical Research Council · AUNSW Department of Education · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeneric instruments for assessing health-related quality of life may lack the sensitivity to detect changes in health specific to certain conditions, such as dementia. The Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) is a widely used and well-validated condition-specific instrument for assessing health-related quality of life for people living with dementia, but it does not enable the calculation of quality-adjusted life years, the basis of cost utility analysis. This study will generate a preference-based scoring algorithm for a health state classification system -the Alzheimer's Disease Five Dimensions (AD-5D) derived from the QOL-AD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Discrete choice experiments with duration (DCE ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The algorithms developed will enable prospective and retrospective economic evaluation of any treatment or intervention targeting people with dementia where the QOL-AD has been administered and will be available online. Results will be disseminated through journals that publish health economics articles and through professional conferences. This study has ethical approval.

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality of LifeResearch DesignAlzheimer DiseaseAustraliaCaregiversCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansLogistic ModelsProspective StudiesPsychometricsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesbest worst scalingdementiadiscrete choice experimentquality adjusted life yearutility weight

Identifiers

PMID29358437
PMCPMC5781065
OpenAlexW2773187057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.