Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358395›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal tissues have differential impacts on cancer risk among tissues.

Satoshi Yamashita, Takayoshi Kishino, Takamasa Takahashi, Taichi Shimazu, Hadrien Charvat, Yasuo Kakugawa, Takeshi Nakajima, Yi-Chia Lee, Naoko Iida, Masahiro Maeda and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Early detection of gastric cancer via multiplex blood assay targeting CfDNA methylation signatures.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. On epigenetic stochasticity, entropy and cancer risk.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Chromosomal copy number amplification-driven Linc01711 contributes to gastric cancer progression through histone modification-mediated reprogramming of cholesterol metabolism.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Satoshi YamashitaDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Takayoshi KishinoDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Takamasa TakahashiDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Taichi ShimazuEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Hadrien CharvatEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Yasuo KakugawaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Takeshi NakajimaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Yi-Chia LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Naoko IidaDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Masahiro MaedaDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Naoko HattoriDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Hideyuki TakeshimaDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Reiko NaganoDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Ichiro OdaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Shoichiro TsuganeEpidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Ming-Shiang WuDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Toshikazu UshijimaDivision of Epigenomics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan; tushijim@ncc.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic and epigenetic alterations are both involved in carcinogenesis, and their low-level accumulation in normal tissues constitutes cancer risk. However, their relative importance has never been examined, as measurement of low-level mutations has been difficult. Here, we measured low-level accumulations of genetic and epigenetic alterations in normal tissues with low, intermediate, and high cancer risk and analyzed their relative effects on cancer risk in the esophagus and stomach. Accumulation of genetic alterations, estimated as a frequency of rare base substitution mutations, significantly increased according to cancer risk in esophageal mucosae, but not in gastric mucosae. The mutation patterns reflected the exposure to lifestyle risk factors. In contrast, the accumulation of epigenetic alterations, measured as DNA methylation levels of marker genes, significantly increased according to cancer risk in both tissues. Patients with cancer (high-risk individuals) were precisely discriminated from healthy individuals with exposure to risk factors (intermediate-risk individuals) by a combination of alterations in the esophagus (odds ratio, 18.2; 95% confidence interval, 3.69-89.9) and by only epigenetic alterations in the stomach (odds ratio, 7.67; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-23.3). The relative importance of epigenetic alterations upon genetic alterations was 1.04 in the esophagus and 2.31 in the stomach. The differential impacts among tissues will be critically important for effective cancer prevention and precision cancer risk diagnosis.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellDNA MethylationEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleGastric MucosaGenome-Wide Association StudyHelicobacter InfectionsHumansMaleMutation RatePoint MutationRisk FactorsStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorTFAP2E protein, humanTranscription Factor AP-2DNA methylationepigeneticsgeneticsmutationsnormal tissues

Identifiers

PMID29358395
PMCPMC5819434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.