Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358365›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Cortical Connections Position Primate Area 25 as a Keystone for Interoception, Emotion, and Memory.

Mary Kate P Joyce, Helen Barbas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impairment of the GABAergic system in the prefrontal cortex of male heroin addicts.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Distortion of overlapping memories relates to arousal and anxiety.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary Kate P JoyceGraduate Program in Neuroscience, Boston University and School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, and.ORCID 0000-0002-8351-0051
Helen BarbasGraduate Program in Neuroscience, Boston University and School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, and barbas@bu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-0832
Boston University · US

Funding

ORGANIZATION OF PREFRONTAL FEEDBACK CIRCUITSR01MH057414 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BARBAS, HELEN · 1999 to 2020
$7.3M
Prefrontal Anatomic Pathways in Executive ControlR01NS024760 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BARBAS, HELEN · 1987 to 2017
$6.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057414NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS024760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural and functional integrity of subgenual cingulate area 25 (A25) is crucial for emotional expression and equilibrium. A25 has a key role in affective networks, and its disruption has been linked to mood disorders, but its cortical connections have yet to be systematically or fully studied. Using neural tracers in rhesus monkeys, we found that A25 was densely connected with other ventromedial and posterior orbitofrontal areas associated with emotions and homeostasis. A moderate pathway linked A25 with frontopolar area 10, an area associated with complex cognition, which may regulate emotions and dampen negative affect. Beyond the frontal lobe, A25 was connected with auditory association areas and memory-related medial temporal cortices, and with the interoceptive-related anterior insula. A25 mostly targeted the superficial cortical layers of other areas, where broadly dispersed terminations comingled with modulatory inhibitory or disinhibitory microsystems, suggesting a dominant excitatory effect. The architecture and connections suggest that A25 is the consummate feedback system in the PFC. Conversely, in the entorhinal cortex, A25 pathways terminated in the middle-deep layers amid a strong local inhibitory microenvironment, suggesting gating of hippocampal output to other cortices and memory storage. The graded cortical architecture and associated laminar patterns of connections suggest how areas, layers, and functionally distinct classes of inhibitory neurons can be recruited dynamically to meet task demands. The complement of cortical connections of A25 with areas associated with memory, emotion, and somatic homeostasis provide the circuit basis to understand its vulnerability in psychiatric and neurologic disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain MappingCerebral CortexConnectomeEmotionsEntorhinal CortexFeedback, PhysiologicalFemaleHomeostasisInteroceptionMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemoryNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingPrefrontal Cortexconnectomecortical systematic variationinhibitory neuronsmood disorderssubgenual cingulatetract-tracing

Identifiers

PMID29358365
PMCPMC5815452
OpenAlexW2784911247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.