Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358293›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2018

Amikacin Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis in Pediatric Cancer Patients.

Ali A Alhadab, Mariam A Ahmed, Richard C Brundage

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Amikacin Therapy in Japanese Pediatric Patients: Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Semimechanistic Modeling of Eravacycline Pharmacodynamics UsingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali A AlhadabDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Mariam A AhmedDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA ahmed452@umn.edu.
Richard C BrundageDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) and simulation analyses to evaluate a standard amikacin dose of 15 mg/kg once daily in children with cancer and to determine an optimal dosing strategy. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed from clinical data collected in 34 pediatric patients and used in a simulation study to predict the population probability of various dosing regimens to achieve accepted safety (steady-state unbound trough plasma concentration [

Indexed as

AmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, TheoreticalNeoplasmsPseudomonas aeruginosaAmikacinAnti-Bacterial Agentscancerpediatricspharmacodynamicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID29358293
PMCPMC5913936
OpenAlexW2790613855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.