Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358291›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2018

Population Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Tigecycline in Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock.

Agnieszka Borsuk-De Moor, Elżbieta Rypulak, Beata Potręć, Paweł Piwowarczyk, Michał Borys, Justyna Sysiak, Dariusz Onichimowski, Grzegorz Raszewski, Mirosław Czuczwar, Paweł Wiczling

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Population Pharmacokinetics of Tigecycline: A Systematic Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Optimizing Antibiotic Therapy forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Effects ofFrontiers in medicine · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Agnieszka Borsuk-De MoorDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Elżbieta Rypulak2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Beata Potręć2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Paweł Piwowarczyk2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Michał Borys2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Justyna Sysiak2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Dariusz OnichimowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Grzegorz RaszewskiDepartment of Physiopathology, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland.
Mirosław Czuczwar2nd Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Paweł WiczlingDepartment of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland wiczling@gumed.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-3161
Medical University of Lublin · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLInstytut Medycyny Wsi im. Witolda Chodźki · PLUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tigecycline is a glycylcycline often used in critically ill patients as the antibiotic of last resort. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of tigecycline in intensive care unit (ICU) patients can be affected by severe pathophysiological changes so that standard dosing might not be adequate. The aim of this study was to describe population PK of high-dose tigecycline in patients with sepsis or septic shock and evaluate the relationship between individual PK parameters and patient covariates. The study population consisted of 37 adult ICU patients receiving a 200-mg loading dose of tigecycline followed by multiple doses of 100 mg every 12 h. Blood samples were collected at 0.5, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after dose administration. A two-compartment model with interindividual (IIV) and interoccasion (IOV) variability in PK parameters was used to describe the concentration-time course of tigecycline. The estimated values of mean population PK parameters were 22.1 liters/h and 69.4 liters/h for elimination and intercompartmental clearance, respectively, and 162 liters and 87.9 liters for volume of the central and peripheral compartment, respectively. The IIV and IOV in clearance were less than 20%. The estimated values of distribution volumes were different from previously published values, which might be due to pathophysiological changes in ICU patients. No systematic relationship between individual PK parameters and patient covariates was found. The developed model does not show evidence that individual tigecycline dosing adjustment based on patient covariates is necessary to obtain the same target concentration in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Dosing adjustments should be based on the pathogens, their susceptibility, and PK targets.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSepsisShock, SepticTigecyclineAnti-Bacterial AgentsTigecyclinepharmacokineticspopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID29358291
PMCPMC5913959
OpenAlexW2794110322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.