ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2018
Eliciting patient values and preferences to inform shared decision making in preventive screening.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It Depends on the Situation": Variability in How Surgical Oncologists Elicit and Integrate Patient Values.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Individual Preference for Fecal Immunochemical Test Options among Younger Adults: A Discrete Choice Experiment.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2026Article
- Screening for primary prevention of fragility fractures: How much time does it take?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023Article
- Identifying Womens' Needs in Making a Treatment Decision for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Article
- What should educators teach to improve preventive health care?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Shared Decision Making in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures and Arrhythmia Management.Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology · 2021Review
- Shared decision making and patients satisfaction with strabismus care-a pilot study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Observational
- What matters to patients? A mixed method study of the importance and consideration of oncology patient demands.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Ethics of Codes and Codes of Ethics: When Is It Ethical to Provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic?Annals of surgery · 2020Article
- Measuring what really matters: Screening in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019Article
- Article
- Age to stop? Appropriate screening in older patients.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019Article
- Article
- Quality of the screening process: An overlooked critical factor and an essential component of shared decision making about screening.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2019Article
- Article
- Patient decision aid for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for use in the consultation: a feasibility study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
- Article
- Practice organization for preventive screening.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29358246PMC5962974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.