Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358071›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018

Prefrontal Control of Visual Distraction.

Joshua D Cosman, Kaleb A Lowe, Wolf Zinke, Geoffrey F Woodman, Jeffrey D Schall

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The role of singleton salience in second-order suppression.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Signal suppression makes search less effortful.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Rapid Inversion of Singleton Distractor Representations Underlies Learned Attentional Suppression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  9. Predictive Distractor Processing Relies on Integrated Proactive and Reactive Attentional Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Working Memory Updating in the Macaque Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: Foundations and emerging issues.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2025
    Review
  17. Conflicting Sensory Information Sharpens the Neural Representations of Early Selective Visuospatial Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua D CosmanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Kaleb A LoweDepartment of Psychology and Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Wolf ZinkeDepartment of Psychology and Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Geoffrey F WoodmanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA.
Jeffrey D SchallDepartment of Psychology and Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. Electronic address: jeffrey.d.schall@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHRISTOS CONSTANTINIDIS · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
SACCADE TARGET SELECTION-FRONTAL CORTEXR01EY008890 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 1991 to 2018
$7.4M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Training in Vision ResearchT32EY007135 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEOFFREY F WOODMAN · 1994 to 2026
$5.8M
Visual Event-Related Potentials: Comparative ElectrophysiologyR01EY019882 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 2010 to 2020
$4.0M
The role of long-term contextual memory in attentional controlF32EY023922 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI COSMAN, JOSHUA DANIEL · 2013 to 2014
$111k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY023922NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008890NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019882NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007135NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avoiding distraction by conspicuous but irrelevant stimuli is critical to accomplishing daily tasks. Regions of prefrontal cortex control attention by enhancing the representation of task-relevant information in sensory cortex, which can be measured in modulation of both single neurons and event-related electrical potentials (ERPs) on the cranial surface [1, 2]. When irrelevant information is particularly conspicuous, it can distract attention and interfere with the selection of behaviorally relevant information. Such distraction can be minimized via top-down control [3-5], but the cognitive and neural mechanisms giving rise to this control over distraction remain uncertain and debated [6-9]. Bridging neurophysiology to electrophysiology, we simultaneously recorded neurons in prefrontal cortex and ERPs over extrastriate visual cortex to track the processing of salient distractors during a visual search task. Critically, when the salient distractor was successfully ignored, but not otherwise, we observed robust suppression of salient distractor representations. Like target selection, the distractor suppression was observed in prefrontal cortex before it appeared over extrastriate cortical areas. Furthermore, all prefrontal neurons that showed suppression of the task-irrelevant distractor also contributed to selecting the target. This suggests a common prefrontal mechanism is responsible for both selecting task-relevant and suppressing task-irrelevant information in sensory cortex. Taken together, our results resolve a long-standing debate over the mechanisms that prevent distraction, and provide the first evidence directly linking suppressed neural firing in prefrontal cortex with surface ERP measures of distractor suppression.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsAnimalsAttentionMacaca mulattaMalePrefrontal CortexVisual CortexVisual Perceptionattention captureexecutive controlextrastriate cortexfrontal eye fieldinhibitionprefrontal cortexsuppression

Identifiers

PMID29358071
PMCPMC5889112
OpenAlexW2765244407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.