Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29358019›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2018

The Early Psychosis Screener (EPS): Quantitative validation against the SIPS using machine learning.

B B Brodey, R R Girgis, O V Favorov, J Addington, D O Perkins, C E Bearden, S W Woods, E F Walker, B A Cornblatt, G Brucato and 3 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine minds: Artificial intelligence in psychiatry.Industrial psychiatry journal · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The Critical Need for Help-Seeking Controls in Clinical High-Risk Research.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

B B BrodeyTeleSage, Inc., 201 East Rosemary St., Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA. Electronic address: bb@telesage.com.
R R GirgisNew York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 31, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: Ragy.girgis@nyspi.columbia.edu.
O V FavorovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 152 MacNider Hall, Campus Box 7575, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: favorov@email.unc.edu.
J AddingtonHotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada. Electronic address: jmadding@ucalgary.ca.
D O PerkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA. Electronic address: diana_perkins@med.unc.edu.
C E BeardenDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, 300 Medical Plaza, Rm 2265, Los Angeles, CA 90095. Electronic address: cbearden@mednet.ucla.edu.
S W WoodsPRIME Psychosis Prodrome Research Clinic, Connecticut Mental Health Center B-38, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. Electronic address: scott.woods@yale.edu.
E F WalkerDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Emory University, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: psyefw@emory.edu.
B A CornblattDepartment of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263rd St., Glen Oaks, New York 11004, USA. Electronic address: cornblat@lij.edu.
G BrucatoNew York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 31, New York, NY 10032, USA.
B WalshPRIME Psychosis Prodrome Research Clinic, Connecticut Mental Health Center B-38, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519, USA. Electronic address: barbara.walsh@yale.edu.
K A ElkinTeleSage, Inc., 201 East Rosemary St., Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA. Electronic address: kelkin@telesage.com.
I S BrodeyThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 434 Greenlaw, Campus Box 3520, Chapel Hill, NC 27599. Electronic address: brodey@email.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USConnecticut Mental Health Center · USNew York State Psychiatric InstituteTelesage (United States) · USEmory University · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USZucker Hillside Hospital · US

Funding

4/9-Predictors and Mechanisms of Conversion to PsychosisU01MH081857 · NIMH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI CORNBLATT, BARBARA A. · 2008 to 2018
$6.2M
IRT-based Self-report Screener for Prodromal Schizophrenia & Early PsychosisR44MH094023 · NIMH · TELESAGE, INC. · PI BRODEY, BENJAMIN B · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH094023NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH081857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning techniques were used to identify highly informative early psychosis self-report items and to validate an early psychosis screener (EPS) against the Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS). The Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version (PQ-B) and 148 additional items were administered to 229 individuals being screened with the SIPS at 7 North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study sites and at Columbia University. Fifty individuals were found to have SIPS scores of 0, 1, or 2, making them clinically low risk (CLR) controls; 144 were classified as clinically high risk (CHR) (SIPS 3-5) and 35 were found to have first episode psychosis (FEP) (SIPS 6). Spectral clustering analysis, performed on 124 of the items, yielded two cohesive item groups, the first mostly related to psychosis and mania, the second mostly related to depression, anxiety, and social and general work/school functioning. Items within each group were sorted according to their usefulness in distinguishing between CLR and CHR individuals using the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance procedure. A receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) analysis indicated that maximal differentiation of CLR and CHR participants was achieved with a 26-item solution (AUC=0.899±0.001). The EPS-26 outperformed the PQ-B (AUC=0.834±0.001). For screening purposes, the self-report EPS-26 appeared to differentiate individuals who are either CLR or CHR approximately as well as the clinician-administered SIPS. The EPS-26 may prove useful as a self-report screener and may lead to a decrease in the duration of untreated psychosis. A validation of the EPS-26 against actual conversion is underway.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProdromal SymptomsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersRiskSchizophreniaSelf ReportYoung AdultMachine learningNAPLSPQ-BProdromalPsychosisSchizophreniaScreenerSIPS

Identifiers

PMID29358019
PMCPMC6051928
OpenAlexW2789211111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.