Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357940›Full record

Trial reportRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Children's experiences and responses towards an intervention for psychological preparation for radiotherapy.

Gunn Engvall, Viveca Lindh, Tara Mullaney, Tufve Nyholm, Jack Lindh, Charlotte Ångström-Brännström

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02993978 (Design and Evaluation of Care Environment and Technology at Pediatric Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02993978 completednot on this map

Design and Evaluation of Care Environment and Technology at Pediatric Radiotherapy

TypeobservationalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2012 to 2015Enrolled57ConditionsPediatric ALL, Radiotherapy Side Effect
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gunn EngvallDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Gunn.Engvall@kbh.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-9650
Viveca LindhDepartment of Nursing, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
Tara MullaneyVeryday, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tufve NyholmDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
Jack LindhDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
Charlotte Ångström-BrännströmDepartment of Nursing, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEUppsala University · SEVeryday (Sweden) · SE

Funding

The Sewdish Childhood Cancer Foundation PR2014-0030The Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation MT 2012-0002The Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation PR2013-0025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren can experience distress when undergoing radiotherapy as a reaction to being scared of and unfamiliar with the procedure. The aim was to evaluate children's experiences and responses towards an intervention for psychological preparation for radiotherapy.

methodsA case control design with qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews and statistical analysis of anxiety ratings were used for evaluating a strategy for psychological preparation and distraction. Fifty-seven children aged 2 to 18 years and their parents participated - 30 children in the baseline group and 27 in the intervention group. Child interviews were performed and the child and their parents rated the child's anxiety.

resultsThe intervention was most appropriate for the younger children, who enjoyed the digital story, the stuffed animal and training with their parents. There were some technical problems and the digital story was not detailed enough to fit exactly with various cancer diagnoses. Children described suggestions for improvement of the intervention. The ratings of the child's anxiety during radiation treatment showed no differences between the baseline group and the intervention group.

conclusionsThe children of all the age groups experienced their interventions as positive. The strength of the intervention was that it encouraged interaction within the family and provided an opportunity for siblings and peers to take part in what the child was going through. Future research on children's experiences to interventions should be encouraged. The intervention and the technical solutions could improve by further development.

trial registrationThe study design was structured as an un-matched case-control study, baseline group vs. intervention group.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02993978 , Protocol Record 2012-113-31 M. Retrospectively registered - 21 November 2016.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnxietyCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePatient Education as TopicRadiotherapyChildhood cancerChildren’s experiencesDistractionPsychological preparationRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29357940
PMCPMC5778737
OpenAlexW2784438929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.