Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357883›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Comparison of the clinical efficacy between single-agent and dual-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Jie Li, Youling Gong, Peng Diao, Qingmei Huang, Yixue Wen, Binwei Lin, Hongwei Cai, Honggang Tian, Bing He, Lanlan Ji and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jie LiDepartment of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, People's Republic of China.
Youling GongDepartment of Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Peng DiaoDepartment of Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Qingmei HuangDepartment of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, People's Republic of China.
Yixue WenDepartment of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, People's Republic of China.
Binwei LinDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Hongwei CaiDepartment of Oncology, Lang Zhong People 's Hospital, Lang Zhong, China.
Honggang TianDepartment of Oncology, Jiang You People s Hospital, Jiang You, China.
Bing HeDepartment of Oncology, Yan Ting County Cancer Hospital, Yan Ting, China.
Lanlan JiDepartment of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou, China.
Ping GuoDepartment of Oncology, Yibin Second People 's Hospital, Yibin, China.
Jidong MiaoDepartment of Oncology, The Fourth People's Hospital of Zigong, Zigong, China.
Xiaobo DuDepartment of Oncology, Mian Yang Central Hospital, Mianyang, 621000, People's Republic of China. duxiaobo2005@126.com.

Funding

Mianyang Science and Technology Bureau 15-S01-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomaare often treated with single-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, no results have been reported from randomized controlled clinical trials comparing single-agent with double-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. It therefore remains unclear whether these regimens are equally clinically effective. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed and compared the therapeutic effects of single-agent and double-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

methodsThis study enrolled 168 patients who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous carcinoma at 10 hospitals between 2010 and 2015. We evaluated survival time and toxicity. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival data. The log-rank test was used in univariate analysis A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to conduct a multivariate analysis of the effects of prognostic factors on survival.

resultsIn this study, 100 (59.5%) and 68 patients (40.5%) received single-agent and dual-agent combination chemoradiotherapy, respectively. The estimate 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate of dual-agent therapy was higher than that of single-agent therapy (52.5% and 40.9%, 78.2% and 60.7%, respectively), but there were no significant differences (P = 0.367 and 0.161, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that sex, age,and radiotherapy dose had no significant effects on OS or PFS. Only disease stage was associated with OS and PFS in the multivariable analysis (P = 0.006 and 0.003, respectively). In dual-agent group, the incidence of acute toxicity and the incidence of 3 and4 grade toxicity were higher than single-agent group.

conclusionThe 5-year PFS and OS rates of dual-agent therapy were higher than those of single-agent concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; however, there were no significant differences in univariate analysis and multivariable analysis. Single-agent concurrent chemotherapy had less toxicity than a double-drug regimen. Therefore, we suggest that single therapis not inferior to dual therapy y. In the future, we aim to confirm our hypothesis through a prospective randomized study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyChinaDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsConcurrent chemoradiotherapyDual-agent chemotherapySingle-agent chemotherapySophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29357883
PMCPMC5778746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.