Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357854›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2018

Individualised treatment targets in patients with type-2 diabetes and hypertension.

Roland E Schmieder, Diethelm Tschöpe, Cornelia Koch, Taoufik Ouarrak, Anselm K Gitt, DIALOGUE study group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Systematic Literature Review of the Impact of Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure Guideline Adherence on Clinical and Economic Outcomes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roland E SchmiederMedizinische Klinik 4, Nephrologie und Hypertensiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. roland.schmieder@uk-erlangen.de.
Diethelm TschöpeDiabeteszentrum am Herz- und Diabeteszentrum Nordrhein-Westfalen, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Cornelia KochNovartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany.
Taoufik OuarrakInstitut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Anselm K GittInstitut für Herzinfarktforschung, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
DIALOGUE study group
Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia · DEStiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung · DENovartis (Germany) · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPatients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at high risk of cardiovascular events, accentuated in the presence of hypertension. At present, it is unclear to what extent the guidelines for the management of T2DM, advocating reduction in HbA1c levels to below target levels, are being adhered to in clinical practice.

methodsDIALOGUE was a prospective, observational, non-interventional registry performed across multiple centres in Germany. Patients aged 18 years or older who had T2DM and hypertension for whom the treating physician considered blood glucose lowering medication as inadequate and/or not safe/tolerable and chose to add a further oral drug or switch drug treatment were included. Patients were assigned a treatment target HbA1c value (≤ 6.5% [strict]; > 6.5 to ≤ 7.0% [intermediate]; > 7.0 to ≤ 7.5% [lenient]).

results8568 patients with T2DM and hypertension were enrolled. 6691 (78.1%) had 12-month follow-up. Patients who were assigned a strict HbA1c treatment target (n = 2644) were younger, had shorter diabetes duration, and less comorbidity in comparison to those with intermediate (n = 2912) or lenient targets (n = 1135). Only 53.1% of patients achieved their HbA1c treatment target (46.2% [strict], 56.8% [intermediate], 59.4% [lenient]). There was little sign of treatment intensification for patients that had not achieved their HbA1c target.

conclusionsAchievement of treatment targets was poor, leaving many patients with sub-optimal blood glucose levels. The apparent reluctance of physicians to intensify antidiabetic drug therapy is alarming, especially considering the evidence pointing to an association of hyperglycaemia and microvascular complications in patients with T2DM.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBlood PressureClinical Decision-MakingComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug SubstitutionDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGermanyGlycated HemoglobinGuideline AdherenceHumansHypertensionHypoglycemic AgentsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsDiabetesGlucoseHbA1cHyperglycaemiaHypertensionIndividualisedTarget

Identifiers

PMID29357854
PMCPMC5778654
OpenAlexW2795364426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.