Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357844›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2018

With axial loading during MRI diurnal T2-value changes in lumbar discs are neglectable: a cross sectional study.

L Torén, H Hebelka, I Kasperska, H Brisby, K Lagerstrand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Compositional magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the intervertebral disc: Axial vs sagittal TJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Trial
  2. Load-induced alterations in posterior parts of intervertebral discs in patients with load-induced pain during MRI; a detailed study using T2 maps.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Different disc characteristics between young elite skiers with diverse training histories revealed with a novel quantitative magnetic resonance imaging method.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Low back pain patients and controls display functional differences in endplates and vertebrae measured with T2-mapping.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Article
  9. Axial loading during MRI reveals deviant characteristics within posterior IVD regions between low back pain patients and controls.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L TorénDepartment of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
H HebelkaDepartment of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.hebelka@vgregion.se.ORCID 0000-0001-5304-8241
I KasperskaDepartment of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
H BrisbyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
K LagerstrandDepartment of Medical Physics and Techniques, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAxial loading during MRI (alMRI) combined with T2 mapping recently was shown as a promising method to reveal biomechanical intervertebral disc (IVD) characteristics. This feasibility study aims to investigate whether there is a diurnal variation in the IVD T2-value when using alMRI. This is of importance for the planning of when to perform alMRI investigations and for interpretations of alMRI findings in relation to clinical symptoms.

methodsSix healthy volunteers (30 lumbar discs), were examined with alMRI at three different sessions during 1 day. To be representative for a low back pain cohort in terms of age and IVD degeneration the included participants had a wide age range (27-63y) and all Pfirrmann grades represented. The T2-values were measured in five IVD regions of interest (ROI). The ROIs were equally large in sagittal plane with ROI1 representing anterior parts of the IVD, ROI5 posterior IVD parts and ROI2-4 the parts in between.

resultsT2-values of the entire IVD varied between 38 and 138 ms at 7 am, 33-143 ms at 11.30 am, and 31-147 ms at 4 pm with large regional IVD variations at all time points. No significant alterations of the T2-values over the day were found, neither for the entire IVD (p = 0.4) nor for the various ROIs (p = 0.2-1.0). Neither when correlated to Pfirrmann grade, any significant diurnal T2-value changes were found.

conclusionsWith alMRI, only minor diurnal T2-value changes were found in the lumbar discs. Nonsignificant and neglectable diurnal changes are advantageous both for research purposes, as well as in the clinical setting, giving comparable and robust data regardless of at what time-point the alMRI is performed.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedWeight-BearingAxial loading during MRI (alMRI)Diurnal variationIVDT2 mappingT2-value

Identifiers

PMID29357844
PMCPMC5778755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.