Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357843›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

An individually randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of the Women for Women International Programme in reducing intimate partner violence and strengthening livelihoods amongst women in Afghanistan: trial design, methods and baseline findings.

Andrew Gibbs, Julienne Corboz, Mohammed Shafiq, Frozan Marofi, Anna Mecagni, Carron Mann, Fazal Karim, Esnat Chirwa, Charlotte Maxwell-Jones, Rachel Jewkes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03236948 (Individually Randomised Control Trial Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Women for Women International), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03236948 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Individually Randomised Control Trial Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Women for Women International (WfWI) Intervention in Afghanistan for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Among Married Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical Research Council, South AfricaRan2016 to 2018Enrolled1,461ConditionsDomestic Violence, Depressive Symptoms, LivelihoodsArmsWomen for Women International Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. SSM - population health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew GibbsGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa. andrew.gibbs@mrc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0003-2812-5377
Julienne CorbozGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mohammed ShafiqWomen for Women International, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Frozan MarofiWomen for Women International, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Anna MecagniWomen for Women International, London, UK.
Carron MannWomen for Women International, London, UK.
Fazal KarimWomen for Women International, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Esnat ChirwaGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Charlotte Maxwell-JonesEureka, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Rachel JewkesGender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate Partner Violence (IPV) is the most common form of violence in conflict and post-conflict settings, but there are few evaluations of interventions to prevent IPV in such settings.

methodsThe Women for Women International (WfWI) intervention is a year-long combined economic and social empowerment intervention for marginalized women survivors of conflict. Primarily, it seeks to support women to achieve four key outcomes: women earn and save money; women improve their health and well-being; women influence decisions in their homes and communities; women connect to networks for support. The organization recognizes Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) as a significant barrier to women's empowerment and expects to see reduction in VAWG, and specifically IPV, as part of building women's social and economic empowerment. This program is being quantitatively evaluated through an individually randomized control trial amongst women in Afghanistan, with a 24-month follow up. A comparison of baseline characteristics of participants is also included as well as a discussion of implementation of the baseline research. DISCUSSION: There is a high demand amongst Afghan women for such interventions, and this posed challenges in completing the randomization and baseline. In addition, the complex security situation in Afghanistan also posed challenges. However, despite these issues, recruitment was successfully achieved and the arms were balanced on socio-demographic measures. The evaluation will contribute to the limited evidence base on interventions to prevent IPV in conflict-affected settings.

trial registrationNCT03236948 . Registered 28 July 2017, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfghanistanFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth PromotionHumansIncomeIntimate Partner ViolenceMiddle AgedPower, PsychologicalProgram EvaluationResearch DesignYoung AdultAfghanistanBaselineEconomic empowermentGender transformationInterventionTrial

Identifiers

PMID29357843
PMCPMC5778673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.