Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357680›Full record

ArticleBrain connectivity2018

Switching Language Modes: Complementary Brain Patterns for Formulaic and Propositional Language.

John J Sidtis, Diana Van Lancker Sidtis, Vijay Dhawan, David Eidelberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain connectivity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurology of social graces in patients with language deficits.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John J Sidtis1 Brain and Behavior Laboratory, The Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research , Orangeburg, New York.
Diana Van Lancker Sidtis1 Brain and Behavior Laboratory, The Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research , Orangeburg, New York.
Vijay Dhawan4 Center for Neurosciences, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research , Manhasset, New York.
David Eidelberg4 Center for Neurosciences, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research , Manhasset, New York.
Center for Neurosciences · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

CORTICAL-SUBCORTICAL INTERACTION IN PD AND NORMAL SPEECHR01DC007658 · NIDCD · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI SIDTIS, DIANA L, SIDTIS, JOHN J · 2006 to 2016
$4.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language has been modeled as a rule governed behavior for generating an unlimited number of novel utterances using phonological, syntactic, and lexical processes. This view of language as essentially propositional is expanding as a contributory role of formulaic expressions (e.g., you know, have a nice day, how are you?) is increasingly recognized. The basic features of the functional anatomy of this language system have been described by studies of brain damage: left lateralization for propositional language and greater right lateralization and basal ganglia involvement for formulaic expressions. Positron emission tomography (PET) studies of cerebral blood flow (CBF) have established a cortical-subcortical pattern of brain activity predictive of syllable rate during phonological/lexical repetition. The same analytic approach was applied to analyzing brain images obtained during spontaneous monologues. Sixteen normal, right-handed, native English speakers underwent PET scanning during several language tasks. Speech rate for the repetition of phonological/lexical items was predicted by increased CBF in the left inferior frontal region and decreased CBF in the head of the right caudate nucleus, replicating previous results. A complementary cortical-subcortical pattern (CBF increased in the right inferior frontal region and decreased in the left caudate) was predictive of the use of speech formulas during monologue speech. The use of propositional language during the monologues was associated with strong left lateralization (increased CBF at the left inferior frontal region and decreased CBF at the right inferior frontal region). Normal communication involves the integration of two language modes, formulaic and novel, that have different neural substrates.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultAgedCaudate NucleusCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleFunctional LateralityFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPrefrontal CortexSpeechbasal ganglialanguagelateralityperformance-based analysispositron emission tomographyspeech formulas

Identifiers

PMID29357680
PMCPMC5899291
OpenAlexW2791395539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.