Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357464›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Beyond the labeled line: variation in visual reference frames from intraparietal cortex to frontal eye fields and the superior colliculus.

Valeria C Caruso, Daniel S Pages, Marc A Sommer, Jennifer M Groh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Encoding of 2D Self-Centered Plans and World-Centered Positions in the Rat Frontal Orienting Field.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Presaccadic preview shapes postsaccadic processing more where perception is poor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valeria C CarusoDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-3895-1296
Daniel S PagesDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina.
Marc A SommerDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-5061-763X
Jennifer M GrohDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-6435-3935
Duke University · US

Funding

CRCNS: Integrative Information ProcessingR01NS050942 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GROH, JENNIFER M · 2004 to 2013
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We accurately perceive the visual scene despite moving our eyes ~3 times per second, an ability that requires incorporation of eye position and retinal information. In this study, we assessed how this neural computation unfolds across three interconnected structures: frontal eye fields (FEF), intraparietal cortex (LIP/MIP), and the superior colliculus (SC). Single-unit activity was assessed in head-restrained monkeys performing visually guided saccades from different initial fixations. As previously shown, the receptive fields of most LIP/MIP neurons shifted to novel positions on the retina for each eye position, and these locations were not clearly related to each other in either eye- or head-centered coordinates (defined as hybrid coordinates). In contrast, the receptive fields of most SC neurons were stable in eye-centered coordinates. In FEF, visual signals were intermediate between those patterns: around 60% were eye-centered, whereas the remainder showed changes in receptive field location, boundaries, or responsiveness that rendered the response patterns hybrid or occasionally head-centered. These results suggest that FEF may act as a transitional step in an evolution of coordinates between LIP/MIP and SC. The persistence across cortical areas of mixed representations that do not provide unequivocal location labels in a consistent reference frame has implications for how these representations must be read out. NEW & NOTEWORTHY How we perceive the world as stable using mobile retinas is poorly understood. We compared the stability of visual receptive fields across different fixation positions in three visuomotor regions. Irregular changes in receptive field position were ubiquitous in intraparietal cortex, evident but less common in the frontal eye fields, and negligible in the superior colliculus (SC), where receptive fields shifted reliably across fixations. Only the SC provides a stable labeled-line code for stimuli across saccades.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaAnimalsElectroencephalographyFrontal LobeMacaca mulattaParietal LobeSaccadesSuperior ColliculiVisual Perceptioncoordinate transformationfrontal eye fieldintraparietal cortexsuperior colliculusvisual saccade

Identifiers

PMID29357464
PMCPMC5966730
OpenAlexW2952693665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.