Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357459›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Impact of light-adaptive mechanisms on mammalian retinal visual encoding at high light levels.

Bart G Borghuis, Charles P Ratliff, Robert G Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adaptation of visual responses in degeneratingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Solo vs. Chorus: Monomers and Oligomers of Arrestin Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Temporal vision: measures, mechanisms and meaning.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  12. Rod Photoreceptors Avoid Saturation in Bright Light by the Movement of the G Protein Transducin.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bart G BorghuisDepartment of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine , Louisville, Kentucky.
Charles P RatliffCenter for Systems Vision Science, Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Robert G SmithDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Retinal circuits for precise signalingR01EY016607 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SMITH, ROBERT G · 2006 to 2014
$2.7M
Understanding signal processing in retinal bipolar cell pathwaysR01EY028188 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BORGHUIS, BART GERARD · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Retinal circuits for local synaptic processingR01EY023766 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI EULER, THOMAS, SMITH, ROBERT G · 2014 to 2017
$1.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016607NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023766NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A persistent change in illumination causes light-adaptive changes in retinal neurons. Light adaptation improves visual encoding by preventing saturation and by adjusting spatiotemporal integration to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and utilize signaling bandwidth efficiently. In dim light, the visual input contains a greater relative amount of quantal noise, and vertebrate receptive fields are extended in space and time to increase SNR. Whereas in bright light, SNR of the visual input is high, the rate of synaptic vesicle release from the photoreceptors is low so that quantal noise in synaptic output may limit SNR postsynaptically. Whether and how reduced synaptic SNR impacts spatiotemporal integration in postsynaptic neurons remains unclear. To address this, we measured spatiotemporal integration in retinal horizontal cells and ganglion cells in the guinea pig retina across a broad illumination range, from low to high photopic levels. In both cell types, the extent of spatial and temporal integration changed according to an inverted U-shaped function consistent with adaptation to low SNR at both low and high light levels. We show how a simple mechanistic model with interacting, opponent filters can generate the observed changes in ganglion cell spatiotemporal receptive fields across light-adaptive states and postulate that retinal neurons postsynaptic to the cones in bright light adopt low-pass spatiotemporal response characteristics to improve visual encoding under conditions of low synaptic SNR.

Indexed as

Adaptation, OcularAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleGuinea PigsMalePhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal Horizontal CellsSignal-To-Noise Ratiohorizontal celllight adaptationretinaretinal ganglion cellwhite noise analysis

Identifiers

PMID29357459
PMCPMC5966735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.