Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357458›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Transmitter release site organization can predict synaptic function at the neuromuscular junction.

Rozita Laghaei, Jun Ma, Tyler B Tarr, Anne E Homan, Lauren Kelly, Megha S Tilvawala, Blake S Vuocolo, Harini P Rajasekaran, Stephen D Meriney, Markus Dittrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CaeLife · 2024
    Article
  6. CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rozita LaghaeiBiomedical Applications Group, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jun MaBiomedical Applications Group, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Tyler B TarrDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Anne E HomanDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lauren KellyDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Megha S TilvawalaDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Blake S VuocoloDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Harini P RajasekaranDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Stephen D MerineyDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Markus DittrichBiomedical Applications Group, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
CRCNS: Transmitter Release Site Organization in Plasticity and Disease at the NMJR01NS090644 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BLANPIED, THOMAS A, LAGHAEI, ROZITA · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have investigated the impact of transmitter release site (active zone; AZ) structure on synaptic function by physically rearranging the individual AZ elements in a previously published frog neuromuscular junction (NMJ) AZ model into the organization observed in a mouse NMJ AZ. We have used this strategy, purposefully without changing the properties of AZ elements between frog and mouse models (even though there are undoubtedly differences between frog and mouse AZ elements in vivo), to directly test how structure influences function at the level of an AZ. Despite a similarly ordered ion channel array substructure within both frog and mouse AZs, frog AZs are much longer and position docked vesicles in a different location relative to AZ ion channels. Physiologically, frog AZs have a lower probability of transmitter release compared with mouse AZs, and frog NMJs facilitate strongly during short stimulus trains in contrast with mouse NMJs that depress slightly. Using our computer modeling approach, we found that a simple rearrangement of the AZ building blocks of the frog model into a mouse AZ organization could recapitulate the physiological differences between these two synapses. These results highlight the importance of simple AZ protein organization to synaptic function. NEW & NOTEWORTHY A simple rearrangement of the basic building blocks in the frog neuromuscular junction model into a mouse transmitter release site configuration predicted the major physiological differences between these two synapses, suggesting that transmitter release site structure and organization is a strong predictor of function.

Indexed as

Ion ChannelsModels, NeurologicalSynaptic VesiclesAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceNeuromuscular JunctionRana pipiensSynaptic TransmissionIon Channelsactive zoneneuromuscular junctiontransmitter release

Identifiers

PMID29357458
PMCPMC5966726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.