ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018
Corticospinal gating during action preparation and movement in the primate motor cortex.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensory integration deficits in Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait: cortical network dynamics and paradoxical dopaminergic modulation.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Differential participation of the corticospinal and corticorubral neurons during motor execution in the rat.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Corticospinal and corticoreticulospinal projections have discrete but complementary roles in chronic motor behaviors after stroke.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Neuronal population dynamics during motor plan cancellation in nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.Experimental brain research · 2022Review
- The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021Review
- Movement initiation and grasp representation in premotor and primary motor cortex mirror neurons.eLife · 2020Article
- Responses of neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of conscious cats to anticipated and passive movements.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2020Article
- Corticocortical Systems Underlying High-Order Motor Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Review
- Non-invasive assessment of superficial and deep layer circuits in human motor cortex.The Journal of physiology · 2019Article
- Mechanisms of Network Interactions for Flexible Cortico-Basal Ganglia-Mediated Action Control.eNeuroArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
During everyday actions there is a need to be able to withhold movements until the most appropriate time. This motor inhibition is likely to rely on multiple cortical and subcortical areas, but the primary motor cortex (M1) is a critical component of this process. However, the mechanisms behind this inhibition are unclear, particularly the role of the corticospinal system, which is most often associated with driving muscles and movement. To address this, recordings were made from identified corticospinal (PTN, n = 94) and corticomotoneuronal (CM, n = 16) cells from M1 during an instructed delay reach-to-grasp task. The task involved the animals withholding action for ~2 s until a GO cue, after which they were allowed to reach and perform the task for a food reward. Analysis of the firing of cells in M1 during the delay period revealed that, as a population, non-CM PTNs showed significant suppression in their activity during the cue and instructed delay periods, while CM cells instead showed a facilitation during the preparatory delay. Analysis of cell activity during movement also revealed that a substantial minority of PTNs (27%) showed suppressed activity during movement, a response pattern more suited to cells involved in withholding rather than driving movement. These results demonstrate the potential contributions of the M1 corticospinal system to withholding of actions and highlight that suppression of activity in M1 during movement preparation is not evenly distributed across different neural populations. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recordings were made from identified corticospinal (PTN) and corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells during an instructed delay task. Activity of PTNs as a population was suppressed during the delay, in contrast to CM cells, which were facilitated. A minority of PTNs showed a rate profile that might be expected from inhibitory cells and could suggest that they play an active role in action suppression, most likely through downstream inhibitory circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.