Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357454›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2018

Corticospinal gating during action preparation and movement in the primate motor cortex.

Demetris S Soteropoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuronal population dynamics during motor plan cancellation in nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.Experimental brain research · 2022
    Review
  6. The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Responses of neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of conscious cats to anticipated and passive movements.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Corticocortical Systems Underlying High-Order Motor Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Demetris S SoteropoulosInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University Medical School , Newcastle upon Tyne , United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023012/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During everyday actions there is a need to be able to withhold movements until the most appropriate time. This motor inhibition is likely to rely on multiple cortical and subcortical areas, but the primary motor cortex (M1) is a critical component of this process. However, the mechanisms behind this inhibition are unclear, particularly the role of the corticospinal system, which is most often associated with driving muscles and movement. To address this, recordings were made from identified corticospinal (PTN, n = 94) and corticomotoneuronal (CM, n = 16) cells from M1 during an instructed delay reach-to-grasp task. The task involved the animals withholding action for ~2 s until a GO cue, after which they were allowed to reach and perform the task for a food reward. Analysis of the firing of cells in M1 during the delay period revealed that, as a population, non-CM PTNs showed significant suppression in their activity during the cue and instructed delay periods, while CM cells instead showed a facilitation during the preparatory delay. Analysis of cell activity during movement also revealed that a substantial minority of PTNs (27%) showed suppressed activity during movement, a response pattern more suited to cells involved in withholding rather than driving movement. These results demonstrate the potential contributions of the M1 corticospinal system to withholding of actions and highlight that suppression of activity in M1 during movement preparation is not evenly distributed across different neural populations. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Recordings were made from identified corticospinal (PTN) and corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells during an instructed delay task. Activity of PTNs as a population was suppressed during the delay, in contrast to CM cells, which were facilitated. A minority of PTNs showed a rate profile that might be expected from inhibitory cells and could suggest that they play an active role in action suppression, most likely through downstream inhibitory circuits.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMacaca mulattaMotor ActivityMotor CortexMotor NeuronsNeural InhibitionPyramidal TractsSensory Gatingcorticospinal systemgatingpreparatory delay

Identifiers

PMID29357454
PMCPMC5966733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.