ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
What drives the perceptual change resulting from speech motor adaptation? Evaluation of hypotheses in a Bayesian modeling framework.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active inference and speech motor control.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Articulatory effort modulates speech adaptation to auditory perturbations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of sensorimotor adaptation in a hierarchical state feedback control model of speech.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Correlation between the effect of orofacial somatosensory inputs in speech perception and speech production performance.Auditory perception & cognition · 2023Article
- Perturbing the consistency of auditory feedback in speech.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Integrating prediction errors at two time scales permits rapid recalibration of speech sound categories.eLife · 2020Article
- Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Precision of voicing perceptual identification is altered in association with voice-onset time production changes.Experimental brain research · 2019Article
- Article
- Modeling Sensory Preference in Speech Motor Planning: A Bayesian Modeling Framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- The ConDialInt Model: Condensation, Dialogality, and Intentionality Dimensions of Inner Speech Within a Hierarchical Predictive Control Framework.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shifts in perceptual boundaries resulting from speech motor learning induced by perturbations of the auditory feedback were taken as evidence for the involvement of motor functions in auditory speech perception. Beyond this general statement, the precise mechanisms underlying this involvement are not yet fully understood. In this paper we propose a quantitative evaluation of some hypotheses concerning the motor and auditory updates that could result from motor learning, in the context of various assumptions about the roles of the auditory and somatosensory pathways in speech perception. This analysis was made possible thanks to the use of a Bayesian model that implements these hypotheses by expressing the relationships between speech production and speech perception in a joint probability distribution. The evaluation focuses on how the hypotheses can (1) predict the location of perceptual boundary shifts once the perturbation has been removed, (2) account for the magnitude of the compensation in presence of the perturbation, and (3) describe the correlation between these two behavioral characteristics. Experimental findings about changes in speech perception following adaptation to auditory feedback perturbations serve as reference. Simulations suggest that they are compatible with a framework in which motor adaptation updates both the auditory-motor internal model and the auditory characterization of the perturbed phoneme, and where perception involves both auditory and somatosensory pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.