Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357351›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Identification of osmoadaptive strategies in the halophile, heterotrophic ciliate Schmidingerothrix salinarum.

Lea Weinisch, Steffen Kühner, Robin Roth, Maria Grimm, Tamara Roth, Daili J A Netz, Antonio J Pierik, Sabine Filker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Isolation and Genomics ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  20. Genomic Analysis of Halotolerant Bacterial StrainsJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lea WeinischDepartment of Molecular Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Steffen KühnerDepartment of Molecular Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Robin RothDepartment of Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Maria GrimmDepartment of Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Tamara RothDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Daili J A NetzDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Antonio J PierikDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Sabine FilkerDepartment of Molecular Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4544-8277
University of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypersaline environments pose major challenges to their microbial residents. Microorganisms have to cope with increased osmotic pressure and low water activity and therefore require specific adaptation mechanisms. Although mechanisms have already been thoroughly investigated in the green alga Dunaliella salina and some halophilic yeasts, strategies for osmoadaptation in other protistan groups (especially heterotrophs) are neither as well known nor as deeply investigated as for their prokaryotic counterpart. This is not only due to the recent awareness of the high protistan diversity and ecological relevance in hypersaline systems, but also due to methodological shortcomings. We provide the first experimental study on haloadaptation in heterotrophic microeukaryotes, using the halophilic ciliate Schmidingerothrix salinarum as a model organism. We established three approaches to investigate fundamental adaptation strategies known from prokaryotes. First, proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy was used for the detection, identification, and quantification of intracellular compatible solutes. Second, ion-imaging with cation-specific fluorescent dyes was employed to analyze changes in the relative ion concentrations in intact cells. Third, the effect of salt concentrations on the catalytic performance of S. salinarum malate dehydrogenase (MDH) and isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH) was determined. 1H-NMR spectroscopy identified glycine betaine (GB) and ectoine (Ect) as the main compatible solutes in S. salinarum. Moreover, a significant positive correlation of intracellular GB and Ect concentrations and external salinity was observed. The addition of exogenous GB, Ect, and choline (Ch) stimulated the cell growth notably, indicating that S. salinarum accumulates the solutes from the external medium. Addition of external 13C2-Ch resulted in conversion to 13C2-GB, indicating biosynthesis of GB from Ch. An increase of external salinity up to 21% did not result in an increase in cytoplasmic sodium concentration in S. salinarum. This, together with the decrease in the catalytic activities of MDH and ICDH at high salt concentration, demonstrates that S. salinarum employs the salt-out strategy for haloadaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAmino Acids, DiaminoBetaineBiological EvolutionCatalysisCholineCiliophoraCytoplasmEvolution, MolecularIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMalate DehydrogenaseOsmotic PressureProkaryotic CellsSalt ToleranceSodium ChlorideAmino Acids, DiaminoBetaineCholineectoineIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMalate Dehydrogenasemalate dehydrogenase (decarboxylating)Sodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID29357351
PMCPMC5794333
OpenAlexW2784466252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.