Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357102›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2018

Methods of Estimating Kidney Function for Drug Dosing in Special Populations.

Laura A Hart, Gail D Anderson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura A HartDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Gail D AndersonDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. gaila@washington.edu.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International guidelines recommend the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) method to monitor kidney function in chronic kidney disease using either creatinine- or cystatin C-based estimation methods. The choice of an estimation method to determine dosage for renally eliminated drugs is not as clear. For the majority of currently marketed drugs, the Cockcroft-Gault equation with the Jaffe method, a non-isotope dilution mass spectrometry, standardized serum creatinine, was used to estimate kidney function to recommend dosing adjustment in kidney impairment. As the Cockcroft-Gault equation cannot be converted for isotope dilution mass spectrometry-traceable creatinine values and clinical laboratories now report estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate by the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation or CKD-EPI, the eGFR is now more widely accepted for dosage adjustment recommendations. Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD Equation, and CKD-EPI creatinine-based methods were developed in specific populations, which included either none or a low proportion of obese individuals, pregnant women, older adults, and those with significant comorbid conditions. Clinical studies in these special populations have identified significant decreased accuracy, precision, and bias in the creatinine-based methods. Newer cystatin C-based estimation methods may significantly improve the ability to estimate kidney function to determine doses in the future. At this time, the increased cost and lack of standardization of serum cystatin C hinder routine use.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateAgedBiomarkers, PharmacologicalChildCreatinineCystatin CFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPharmaceutical PreparationsPregnancyRenal Insufficiency, ChronicBiomarkers, PharmacologicalCreatinineCST3 protein, humanCystatin CPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID29357102
OpenAlexW2790886554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.