ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2018
Methods of Estimating Kidney Function for Drug Dosing in Special Populations.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimated glomerular filtration rates are higher when creatinine-based equations are compared with a cystatin C-based equation in coronavirus disease 2019.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Correct use of non-indexed eGFR for drug dosing and renal drug-related problems at hospital admission.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Observational
- Understanding kidney disease in rural central Uganda - Findings from a qualitative study.Global public health · 2020Article
- Differences in Kidney Function Estimates Based on Creatinine and/or Cystatin C in Non-Traumatic Amputation Patients and Their Impact on Drug Prescribing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Pharmacokinetic Factors to Consider in the Selection of Antiseizure Drugs for Older Patients with Epilepsy.Drugs & aging · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
International guidelines recommend the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) method to monitor kidney function in chronic kidney disease using either creatinine- or cystatin C-based estimation methods. The choice of an estimation method to determine dosage for renally eliminated drugs is not as clear. For the majority of currently marketed drugs, the Cockcroft-Gault equation with the Jaffe method, a non-isotope dilution mass spectrometry, standardized serum creatinine, was used to estimate kidney function to recommend dosing adjustment in kidney impairment. As the Cockcroft-Gault equation cannot be converted for isotope dilution mass spectrometry-traceable creatinine values and clinical laboratories now report estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate by the Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Equation or CKD-EPI, the eGFR is now more widely accepted for dosage adjustment recommendations. Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD Equation, and CKD-EPI creatinine-based methods were developed in specific populations, which included either none or a low proportion of obese individuals, pregnant women, older adults, and those with significant comorbid conditions. Clinical studies in these special populations have identified significant decreased accuracy, precision, and bias in the creatinine-based methods. Newer cystatin C-based estimation methods may significantly improve the ability to estimate kidney function to determine doses in the future. At this time, the increased cost and lack of standardization of serum cystatin C hinder routine use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.