Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29357099›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2018

Treatment of selective mutism: a 5-year follow-up study.

Beate Oerbeck, Kristin Romvig Overgaard, Murray B Stein, Are Hugo Pripp, Hanne Kristensen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01002196 (How to Help When Silence is Not Golden A RCT Study of Selective Mutism), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01002196 phase2completednot on this map

How to Help When Silence is Not Golden A RCT Study of Selective Mutism

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegionsenter for barn og unges psykiske helseRan2009 to 2011Enrolled24ConditionsSelective MutismArmsStimulus fading procedures, Guidance on defocused communication
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Youth with selective mutism: a nationwide patient registry study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Physical Freezing in Children and Adolescents with Selective Mutism.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Beate OerbeckDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, Po box 4959, 0424, Oslo, Norway. b-oerbe@online.no.
Kristin Romvig OvergaardDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Nydalen, Po box 4959, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Murray B SteinUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Are Hugo PrippDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hanne KristensenCentre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway · NOUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective mutism (SM) has been defined as an anxiety disorder in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the recommended approach for SM, but prospective long-term outcome studies are lacking. Reports from the children themselves, and the use of more global quality of life measures, are also missing in the literature. We have developed a school-based CBT intervention previously found to increase speech in a pilot efficacy study and a randomized controlled treatment study. Continued progress was found in our 1-year follow-up studies, where older age and more severe SM had a significant negative effect upon outcome. In the present study, we provide 5-year outcome data for 30 of these 32 children with SM who completed the same CBT for mean 21 weeks (sd 5, range 8-24) at mean age 6 years (10 boys). Mean age at the 5-year follow-up was 11 years (range 8-14). Outcome measures were diagnostic status, the teacher- and parent-rated selective mutism questionnaires, and child rated quality of life and speaking behavior. At the 5-year follow-up, 21 children were in full remission, five were in partial remission and four fulfilled diagnostic criteria for SM. Seven children (23%) fulfilled criteria for social phobia, and separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia and/or enuresis nocturna were found in a total of five children (17%). Older age and severity at baseline and familial SM were significant negative predictors of outcome. Treatment gains were maintained on the teacher- and parent questionnaires. The children rated their overall quality of life as good. Although most of them talked outside of home, 50% still experienced it as somewhat challenging. These results point to the long-term effectiveness of CBT for SM, but also highlight the need to develop more effective interventions for the subset of children with persistent symptoms.Clinical trials registration NCT01002196.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild Behavior DisordersChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMutismProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSelf ReportCBTChild anxietyQuality of lifeSelective mutismSelf-report

Identifiers

PMID29357099
PMCPMC6060963
OpenAlexW2784835087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.