Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29356983›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2018

Assessment of target-mediated uptake with immuno-PET: analysis of a phase I clinical trial with an anti-CD44 antibody.

Yvonne W S Jauw, Marc C Huisman, Tapan K Nayak, Danielle J Vugts, Randolph Christen, Valerie Meresse Naegelen, Dominik Ruettinger, Florian Heil, Adriaan A Lammertsma, Henk M W Verheul and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Advances and challenges in immunoPET methodology.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  15. Preclinical Evaluation of an Engineered Single-Chain Fragment Variable-Fragment Crystallizable Targeting Human CD44.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yvonne W S JauwDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. yws.jauw@vumc.nl.
Marc C HuismanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tapan K NayakDepartment of Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.
Danielle J VugtsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Randolph ChristenDepartment of Product Development, Safety Risk Management, Roche, Basel, Switzerland.
Valerie Meresse NaegelenDepartment of Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland.
Dominik RuettingerDepartment of Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center, Munich, Germany.
Florian HeilDepartment of Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center, Munich, Germany.
Adriaan A LammertsmaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk M W VerheulDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Otto S HoekstraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Guus A M S van DongenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van OordtDepartment of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdeally, monoclonal antibodies provide selective treatment by targeting the tumour, without affecting normal tissues. Therefore, antibody imaging is of interest, preferably in early stages of drug development. However, the imaging signal consists of specific, as well as non-specific, uptake. The aim of this study was to assess specific, target-mediated uptake in normal tissues, with immuno-PET in a phase I dose escalation study, using the anti-CD44 antibody RG7356 as example.

resultsData from thirteen patients with CD44-expressing solid tumours included in an imaging sub-study of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using the anti-CD44 antibody RG7356 was analysed.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates how immuno-PET in a dose escalation study provides a non-invasive technique to quantify dose-dependent uptake in normal tissues, indicating specific, target-mediated uptake.

Indexed as

AntibodyAnti-CD44 humanized antibodyMolecular imagingPETRG7356

Identifiers

PMID29356983
PMCPMC5778091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.