Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29356977›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2018

Short- and long-term clinical outcomes of use of beta-interferon or glatiramer acetate for people with clinically isolated syndrome: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and network meta-analysis.

X Armoiry, A Kan, G J Melendez-Torres, R Court, P Sutcliffe, P Auguste, J Madan, C Counsell, A Clarke

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

X ArmoiryWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL, Coventry, England, UK. armoiryxa@gmail.com.
A KanWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL, Coventry, England, UK.
G J Melendez-TorresWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL, Coventry, England, UK.
R CourtWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL, Coventry, England, UK.
P SutcliffeWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL, Coventry, England, UK.
P AugusteWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL, Coventry, England, UK.
J MadanWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL, Coventry, England, UK.
C CounsellDivision of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
A ClarkeWarwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, CV4 7AL, Coventry, England, UK.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBeta-interferon (IFN-β) and glatiramer acetate (GA) have been evaluated in people with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) with the aim to delay a second clinical attack and a diagnosis of clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS). We systematically reviewed trials evaluating the short- and long-term clinical effectiveness of these drugs in CIS.

methodsWe searched multiple electronic databases. We selected randomised controlled studies (RCTs) conducted in CIS patients and where the interventions were IFN-β and GA. Main outcomes were time to CDMS, and discontinuation due to adverse events (AE). We compared interventions using random-effect network meta-analyses (NMA). We also reported outcomes from long-term open-label extension (OLE) studies.

resultsWe identified five primary studies. Four had open-label extensions following double-blind periods comparing outcomes between early vs delayed DMT. Short-term clinical results (double-blind period) showed that all drugs delayed CDMS compared to placebo. Indirect comparisons did not suggest superiority of any one active drug over another. We could not undertake a NMA for discontinuation due to AE. Long-term clinical results (OLE studies) showed that the risk of developing CDMS was consistently reduced across studies after early DMT treatment compared to delayed DMT (HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.55, 0.74). No data supported the benefit of DMTs in reducing the time to, and magnitude of, disability progression.

conclusionsMeta-analyses confirmed that IFN-β and GA delay time to CDMS compared to placebo. In the absence of evidence that early DMTs can reduce disability progression, future research is needed to better identify patients most likely to benefit from long-term DMTs.

Indexed as

Demyelinating DiseasesGlatiramer AcetateHumansImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeGlatiramer AcetateImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaBeta-interferonClinically isolated syndromeGlatiramer acetateMultiple sclerosisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29356977
PMCPMC5937891
OpenAlexW2784436713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.