Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29355934›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2018

Cross-Sector Collaboration in the High-Poverty Setting: Qualitative Results from a Community-Based Diabetes Intervention.

Elizabeth L Tung, Kathryn E Gunter, Nyahne Q Bergeron, Stacy Tessler Lindau, Marshall H Chin, Monica E Peek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth L TungSection of General Internal Medicine, Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-6898-1106
Kathryn E GunterSection of General Internal Medicine, Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-8018-3649
Nyahne Q BergeronSection of General Internal Medicine, Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Stacy Tessler LindauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine-Geriatrics, Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Marshall H ChinSection of General Internal Medicine, Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Monica E PeekSection of General Internal Medicine, Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELBERT S. HUANG · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Evaluating a Self-Care Innovation for Older Adults using Agent-Based ModelingR01AG047869 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LINDAU, STACY TESSLER · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
The University of Chicago Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 Training ProgramK12HS023007 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MELTZER, DAVID O · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
Research and Mentorship in Improving Diabetes CareK24DK071933 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHIN, MARSHALL H · 2005 to 2014
$1.6M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS023007NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047869NIDDK Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research K24 DK071933NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK071933NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949NIH/NIA 1R01 AG 047869-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize the motivations of stakeholders from diverse sectors who engaged in cross-sector collaboration with an academic medical center. DATA SOURCE: Primary qualitative data (2014-2015) were collected from 22 organizations involved in a cross-sector diabetes intervention on the South Side of Chicago. STUDY

designIn-depth, semistructured interviews; participants included leaders from all stakeholder organization types (e.g., businesses, community development, faith-based) involved in the intervention. DATA COLLECTION

methodsData were transcribed verbatim from audio and video recordings. Analysis was conducted using the constant comparison method, derived from grounded theory. PRINCIPAL

findingsAll stakeholders described collaboration as an opportunity to promote community health in vulnerable populations. Among diverse motivations across organization types, stakeholders described collaboration as an opportunity for: financial support, brand enhancement, access to specialized skills or knowledge, professional networking, and health care system involvement in community-based efforts. Based on our findings, we propose a framework for implementing a working knowledge of stakeholder motivations to facilitate effective cross-sector collaboration.

conclusionsWe identified several factors that motivated collaboration across diverse sectors with health care systems to promote health in a high-poverty, urban setting. Understanding these motivations will be foundational to optimizing meaningful cross-sector collaboration and improving diabetes outcomes in the nation's most vulnerable communities.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersCooperative BehaviorInterinstitutional RelationsPoverty AreasStakeholder ParticipationChicagoDiabetes MellitusFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMotivationQualitative Researchcommunity health promotionCross-sector collaborationdiabetesintersectoral healthpopulation health

Identifiers

PMID29355934
PMCPMC6153162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.