Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29354870›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019

Knowledge and Practice of Oral Cancer Screening in Teaching Faculty-Comparison of Specialty and Year of Clinical Experience.

Shintaro Kogi, John DaSilva, Yusuke Mikasa, Cliff Lee, Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai, Qian Yang, Hidemichi Kihara, Ryosuke Abe, Hiroyuki Yamada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oral cancer awareness among dentists: what is missing? A cross-sectional study.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shintaro KogiSchool of Dental Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 1-3-27 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-0805, Japan.
John DaSilvaHarvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Long wood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Yusuke MikasaHarvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Long wood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Cliff LeeHarvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Long wood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Shigemi Ishikawa-NagaiHarvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Long wood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. shigemi_nagai@hsdm.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6364-6552
Qian YangHarvard School of Dental Medicine, 188 Long wood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Hidemichi KiharaSchool of Dental Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 1-3-27 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-0805, Japan.
Ryosuke AbeSchool of Dental Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 1-3-27 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-0805, Japan.
Hiroyuki YamadaSchool of Dental Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 1-3-27 Uchimaru, Morioka, Iwate, 020-0805, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge, practice, confidence, and perceived barriers to oral cancer screening among teaching faculty in Japan. Results were compared by specialist as well as years of clinical experience. A 25-question survey was used to assess the oral cancer screening practices of faculty dentists at Iwate Medical University, School of Dental Medicine, the only dental school located in the northeast (Tohoku) region of Japan. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Iwate Medical University. The response rate was 83% (n = 110, 71.8% were male). This survey revealed that only 43.6% of the dentists performed oral cancer screening frequently (always or usually) at the initial appointment, and there was no significant differences between specialists and clinical experience. Visual inspection of the oral cavity was the primary screening method, but the frequency and content of the examination (TMJ and tonsil) was significantly different between specialties. A history of cancer and tobacco use motivated providers to perform an examination and was significantly different between various specialists and clinically experienced providers. In contrast, HPV and alcohol consumption were a weak motivator. The confidence level of providers on their examination knowledge/skills was poor, especially among junior faculty. More than 80% of junior faculty indicated a lack of knowledge/skills as a major barrier.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceDentistsEarly Detection of CancerFacultyFemaleHumansJapanMaleMouth NeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Dentists'Schools, DentalSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer screeningEducationOral cancerRisk factor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.