Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29354869›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2018

Organ donor pancreases for the study of human islet cell histology and pathophysiology: a precious and valuable resource.

Piero Marchetti, Mara Suleiman, Lorella Marselli

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Gain of Function of Malate Dehydrogenase 2 and Familial Hyperglycemia.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Piero MarchettiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and University Hospital, University of Pisa, via Paradisa 2, 56121, Pisa, Italy. piero.marchetti@med.unipi.it.
Mara SuleimanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and University Hospital, University of Pisa, via Paradisa 2, 56121, Pisa, Italy.
Lorella MarselliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and University Hospital, University of Pisa, via Paradisa 2, 56121, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

European Community Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 2 115797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct in vivo assessment of pancreatic islet-cells for the study of the pathophysiology of diabetes in humans is hampered by anatomical and technological hurdles. To date, most of the information that has been generated is derived from histological studies performed on pancreatic tissue from autopsy, surgery, in vivo biopsy or organ donation. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages (as summarised in this commentary); however, in this edition of Diabetologia, Kusmartseva et al ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4494-x ) provide further evidence to support the use of organ donor pancreases for the study of human diabetes. They show that length of terminal hospitalisation of organ donors prior to death does not seem to influence the frequency of inflammatory cells infiltrating the pancreas and the replication of beta cells. These findings are reassuring, demonstrating the reliability of this precious and valuable resource for human islet cells research.

Indexed as

Islets of LangerhansPancrelipaseHumansIslets of Langerhans TransplantationPancreasReproducibility of ResultsPancrelipaseAutoptic samplesBeta cellsIslet cellsOrgan donorsPancreatectomyPancreatic biopsies

Identifiers

PMID29354869
PMCPMC6449064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.