ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2017
Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Risk Factors for Postoperative Delayed Perforation Following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2026Article
- Retrospective comparison of precutting endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic submucosal dissection for small gastric muscularis propria tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Multi-Slice Spiral CT in Diagnosing Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Endoscopic freehand full-thickness resection of a gastric leiomyosarcoma initially diagnosed as gastric leiomyoma on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an intraoperative perforation prediction scoring system for endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive approaches to small gastric stromal tumors: The less with the more.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Efficacy analysis of modified double band ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection and endoscopic mucosal dissection in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (≤ 1.5 cm).Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Endoscopic full-thickness resectionWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Mucosal snare resection-endoscopic submucosal excavation for gastric submucosal tumors: a retrospective study (with video).Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Comparison of endoscopic and laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score-matched study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Gastric Glomus Tumor Resected by Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- Retrospective observational cohort study of laparoscopic surgical strategies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Updates in surgery · 2024Observational
- Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor using clip-and-cut endoscopic full-thickness resection: a single-center, retrospective cohort in Korea.Clinical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Lost in the tunnel: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection guided by endoscopic ultrasound coils.Endoscopy · 2023Article
- Minimally invasive technique for gastric GIST at challenging locations: single incision surgical gastroscopy.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) compared to submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection (STER) for treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Automated machine learning to predict the difficulty for endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Comparison of efficacy and safety between endoscopic and laparoscopic resections in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Comparison of effectiveness and safety between endoscopic and surgical resection for 2-5 cm gastric stromal tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, and about 60% of them are found in the stomach. With the widespread application of endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), more and more gastric GISTs are being found in an early stage (with a relative small diameter and no metastasis), giving the chance of complete resection. Endoscopic resection such as endoscopic band ligation (EBL), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), is a minimally invasive method compared with the conventional surgical approaches (open or laparoscopic), and has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for treating gastric GISTs. This review summarizes the recent advances on endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs, aiming to provide a rational management strategy for gastric GISTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.