ReviewIntegrated pharmacy research & practice2016
A systematic review of the nature of dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies.
Review in Integrated pharmacy research & practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of prescription errors in paediatric care.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Medication errors in community pharmacies: a systematic review of the international literature.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Automation of in-hospital pharmacy dispensing: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review examining the characteristics of users of NHS patient medicines helpline services, and the types of enquiries they make.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of Artificial Intelligence Helpfulness and Uncertainty on Cognitive Interactions with Pharmacists: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Statistical process control within the Six Sigma DMAIC framework for monitoring medication dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies: a Saudi case study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Assessing community pharmacists' practices and strategies to minimize medication dispensing errors: a Jordanian study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Reducing Dispensing Errors for Patient Safety and Quality: A Systems Approach.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators for Medication Safety in Emergency Care Using a SEIPS Model: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Beyond Binary Decisions: Evaluating the Effects of AI Error Type on Trust and Performance in AI-Assisted Tasks.Human factors · 2025Article
- Implementation of Medication-Related Technology and Its Impact on Pharmacy Workflow: Real-World Evidence Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Analysis of Drug Product Dispensing Error Characteristics, Construction and Evaluation of a Risk Warning Model in Outpatient Pharmacy: A Retrospective Study in China.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Enhancing Operational Efficiency and Service Delivery through a Robotic Dispensing System: A Case Study from a Retail Pharmacy in Brazil.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparing Patient Satisfaction with Automated Drug Dispensing System and Traditional Drug Dispensing System: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Exploring Patient Safety Culture: A Study of Community Pharmacies in Karachi, Pakistan.Cureus · 2024Article
- A Novel Two-Stage Induced Deep Learning System for Classifying Similar Drugs with Diverse Packaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of automated dispensing cabinets on dispensing errors, interruptions and pillbox preparation time.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2023Observational
- Implementation status of safety measures to prevent errors with non-oncologic methotrexate: surveys in community and hospital pharmacies.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
- Reducing Medication Errors by Adopting Automatic Dispensing Cabinets in Critical Care Units.Journal of medical systems · 2023Article
- Effect of improvement measures in reducing interruptions in a Japanese hospital pharmacy using a synthetic approach based on resilience engineering and systems thinking.BMC health services research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDispensing errors are common in hospital pharmacies. Investigating dispensing errors is important for identifying the factors involved and developing strategies to reduce their occurrence.
objectivesTo review published studies exploring the incidence and types of dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies and factors contributing to these errors.
methodsElectronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, and Web of Science were searched for articles published between January 2000 and January 2015. Inclusion criteria were: studies published in English, and studies investigating type, incidence and factors contributing to dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies. One researcher searched for all relevant published articles, screened all titles and abstracts, and obtained complete articles. A second researcher assessed the titles, abstracts, and complete articles to verify the reliability of the selected articles. KEY
findingsFifteen studies met the inclusion criteria all of which were conducted in just four countries. Reviewing incident reports and direct observation were the main methods used to investigate dispensing errors. Dispensing error rates varied between countries (0.015%-33.5%) depending on the dispensing system, research method, and classification of dispensing error types. The most frequent dispensing errors reported were dispensing the wrong medicine, dispensing the wrong drug strength, and dispensing the wrong dosage form. The most common factors associated with dispensing errors were: high workload, low staffing, mix-up of look-alike/ sound-alike drugs, lack of knowledge/experience, distractions/interruptions, and communication problems within the dispensary team.
conclusionStudies relating to dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies are few in number and have been conducted in just four countries. The majority of these studies focused on the investigation of dispensing error types with no mention of contributing factors or strategies for reducing dispensing errors. Others studies are thus needed to investigate dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies, and a combined approach is recommended to investigate contributing factors associated with dispensing errors and explore strategies for reducing these errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.