Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29354494›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2017

Do we have biomarkers to predict response to neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in bladder cancer?

Felix Wezel, Stefan Vallo, Florian Roghmann, Young Academic Urologist Urothelial Carcinoma Group of the European Association of Urology

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04872036 (Investigation of Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Platinum Regimens), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04872036 completednot on this map

Investigation of Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Platinum Regimens

TypeobservationalSponsorHellenic Cooperative Oncology GroupRan2000 to 2017Enrolled66ConditionsBladder Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nomograms in Urologic Oncology: Lights and Shadows.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  7. Tumor heterogeneity in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Felix WezelDepartment of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Stefan ValloDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Florian RoghmannDepartment of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany.
Young Academic Urologist Urothelial Carcinoma Group of the European Association of Urology
Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care treatment of localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC). However, about 50% of patients develop metastases within 2 years after cystectomy. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before cystectomy improves the overall survival (OS) in patients with muscle-invasive BC. Pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a strong predictor of better disease-specific survival. Nevertheless, some patients do not benefit from chemotherapy. The identification of reliable biomarkers enabling clinicians to identify patients who might benefit from chemotherapy is a very important clinical task. An identification tool could lead to individualized therapy, optimizing response rates. In addition, unnecessary treatment with chemotherapy which potentially leads to a loss of quality of life and which might also might cause a delay of cystectomy in a neoadjuvant setting could be avoided. The present review aims to summarize and discuss the current literature on biomarkers for the prediction of response to systemic therapy in muscle-invasive BC. Tremendous efforts in genetic and molecular characterization have led to the identification of predictive candidate biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma (UC), although prospective validation is pending. Ongoing clinical trials examining the benefit of individual therapies in UC of the bladder (UCB) by molecular patient selection hold promise to shed light on this question.

Indexed as

biomarkerBladder cancer (BC)chemotherapyimmunotherapyurothelial carcinoma (UC)

Identifiers

PMID29354494
PMCPMC5760384
OpenAlexW2765661107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.