ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2017
Do we have biomarkers to predict response to neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in bladder cancer?
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04872036 (Investigation of Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Platinum Regimens), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Investigation of Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Platinum Regimens
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Review of Current Approaches in Bladder Cancer Treatment.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- Biomarkers for predicting bladder cancer therapy response.Oncology research · 2025Review
- Emerging strategies for the improvement of chemotherapy in bladder cancer: Current knowledge and future perspectives.Journal of advanced research · 2022Review
- HUS1 as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Urothelial Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Shorter Leukocyte Telomere Length Is Associated with Worse Survival of Patients with Bladder Cancer and Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2021Article
- Nomograms in Urologic Oncology: Lights and Shadows.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Tumor heterogeneity in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- Doxorubicin metabolism moderately attributes to putative toxicity in prodigiosin/doxorubicin synergism in vitro cells.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2020Article
- Current Perspectives on Immunotherapy in the Peri-Operative Setting of Muscle-Infiltrating Bladder Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Development of immunotherapy in bladder cancer: present and future on targeting PD(L)1 and CTLA-4 pathways.World journal of urology · 2018Review
- Refining the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced bladder cancer: from conviction to optimization.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard of care treatment of localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC). However, about 50% of patients develop metastases within 2 years after cystectomy. Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before cystectomy improves the overall survival (OS) in patients with muscle-invasive BC. Pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment is a strong predictor of better disease-specific survival. Nevertheless, some patients do not benefit from chemotherapy. The identification of reliable biomarkers enabling clinicians to identify patients who might benefit from chemotherapy is a very important clinical task. An identification tool could lead to individualized therapy, optimizing response rates. In addition, unnecessary treatment with chemotherapy which potentially leads to a loss of quality of life and which might also might cause a delay of cystectomy in a neoadjuvant setting could be avoided. The present review aims to summarize and discuss the current literature on biomarkers for the prediction of response to systemic therapy in muscle-invasive BC. Tremendous efforts in genetic and molecular characterization have led to the identification of predictive candidate biomarkers in urothelial carcinoma (UC), although prospective validation is pending. Ongoing clinical trials examining the benefit of individual therapies in UC of the bladder (UCB) by molecular patient selection hold promise to shed light on this question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.