Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29354492›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2017

Peri-operative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: status-quo in 2017.

Benjamin Pradère, Constance Thibault, Malte W Vetterlein, Jeffrey J Leow, Benoit Peyronnet, Morgan Rouprêt, Thomas Seisen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin PradèreDepartment of Urology, CHRU Tours, Faculté de Médecine François Rabelais, Tours, France.
Constance ThibaultDepartment of Medical Oncology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Malte W VetterleinDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jeffrey J LeowDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Benoit PeyronnetDepartment of Urology, Pontchaillou Hospital, Rennes, France.
Morgan RouprêtDepartment of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Thomas SeisenDepartment of Urology, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRHôpital Pontchaillou · FRTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGUniversité de Tours · FRUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of perioperative chemotherapy associated with radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer has been analyzed in several landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) over the past decades. With regard to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence and long-term results from the largest RCTs support its use, which is currently advocated as the standard of care by most of the clinical guidelines worldwide. However, with regard to the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), evidence is more contentious. Specifically, several meta-analyses demonstrated a survival benefit associated with the use of cisplatin-based regimen but investigators identified multiple methodological limitations in most of included RCTs. Nonetheless, AC is currently considered for fit patients with adverse pathological features at RC. It is noteworthy that the delivery of such cytotoxic treatment after surgery may maintain significant anti-tumor activity even in those patients who previously received NAC. Finally, given its greater response rate, the methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin plus cisplatin combination remains preferentially considered in the neoadjuvant setting, while the gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination is more commonly delivered in the adjuvant setting because of its better toxicity profile. However, no prospective evidence comparing efficacy of both regimens for NAC or AC is currently available.

Indexed as

chemotherapy, adjuvantcisplatincystectomydrug therapyneoadjuvant therapyUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29354492
PMCPMC5760386
OpenAlexW2766130817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.