Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29354355›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

CTAB influenced differential elution of metagenomic DNA from saltpan and marine sediments.

Bhavya Kachiprath, G Jayanath, Solly Solomon, Manomi Sarasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bhavya KachiprathDepartment of Marine Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, School of Marine Sciences, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala 682016 India.
G JayanathDepartment of Marine Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, School of Marine Sciences, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala 682016 India.
Solly SolomonDepartment of Marine Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, School of Marine Sciences, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala 682016 India.
Manomi SarasanDepartment of Marine Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, School of Marine Sciences, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin, Kerala 682016 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A simple, reliable method for genomic DNA extraction from sediments with minimum contaminants was developed to address the risk of poor quality DNA in metagenomic studies. Nine DNA extraction methods using 20% cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide (CTAB) were performed and compared to develop an extraction protocol that can offer humic acid-free metagenomic DNA from marine and saltpan sediments. Community DNA extraction was executed via., Zhou et al. modified protocol using 20% CTAB treatment at different steps to compare the efficacy of humic acid removal. Out of nine DNA extraction methods, method 6 significantly improved the quality of DNA with efficient removal of humic substances. 16S rRNA gene amplification and spectrophotometric analysis confirmed the efficiency of method 6 to remove DNA inhibitors from marine sediments as well as saltpan samples. Inhibitors extracted along with metagenomic DNA outcome increased DNA yield and PCR inhibition in method 1 and 3. However, repeated 20% CTAB wash in method 6 ensured 16S amplification and least yield and concentration. Current study explains a detailed protocol based on 20% CTAB wash for the extraction of humic acid-free DNA from diverse sediment samples.

Indexed as

CTABDNA extractionHumic acid removalMarine sedimentMetagenomic DNAPCR inhibitory compoundsSaltpan

Identifiers

PMID29354355
PMCPMC5752666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.