ReviewWorld journal of radiology2017
Endovascular treatment of pulmonary embolism: Selective review of available techniques.
Review in World journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in Pulmonary Embolism Management: Current Approaches and Future Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of Aspiration Catheters with Modified Standard Catheters for Treatment of Large Pulmonary Embolism Using an In-vitro Patho-Physiological Model.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022Article
- Outcomes of catheter-directed interventions in high-risk pulmonary embolism-a retrospective analysis.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2021Article
- Catheter-directed therapies for pulmonary embolism: considerations for patients with patent foramen ovale.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Review
- Side-hole catheters have higher thrombus aspiration efficiency than regular end-hole catheters in an in vitro model.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2020Article
- Role of Interventional Radiologist in the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2020Review
- Future perspectives in catheter-based treatment of pulmonary embolism.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2019Article
- Catheter-based Therapy for Massive Pulmonary Embolism in an Elderly Woman with Chest Pain and Dyspnea: Case Report.Cureus · 2019Article
- Pulmonary embolism response teams: Purpose, evidence for efficacy, and future research directions.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2019Review
- [Comparison of the effects of two cephalomedullary nails (zimmer natural nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation) in treatment of elderly intertrochan teric fractures].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of death in hospitalized patients. The development of sophisticated diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for PE, including endovascular therapy, affords a certain level of complexity to the treatment of patients with this important clinical entity. Furthermore, the lack of level I evidence for the safety and effectiveness of catheter directed therapy brings controversy to a promising treatment approach. In this review paper, we discuss the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of PE, review the medical and surgical treatment of the condition, and describe in detail the tools that are available for the endovascular therapy of PE, including mechanical thrombectomy, suction thrombectomy, and fibrinolytic therapy. We also review the literature available to date on these methods, and describe the function of the Pulmonary Embolism Response Team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.