Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29354124›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2017

Eat Prey, Live:

Joe Dan Dunn, Cristina Bosmani, Caroline Barisch, Lyudmil Raykov, Louise H Lefrançois, Elena Cardenal-Muñoz, Ana Teresa López-Jiménez, Thierry Soldati

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Queue Gaps Among the IQGAPs inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A New Classification Framework to Understand Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phagocytosis at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joe Dan DunnFaculty of Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cristina BosmaniFaculty of Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Caroline BarischFaculty of Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lyudmil RaykovFaculty of Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Louise H LefrançoisFaculty of Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elena Cardenal-MuñozFaculty of Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ana Teresa López-JiménezFaculty of Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Thierry SoldatiFaculty of Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The soil-dwelling social amoeba

Indexed as

autophagycell-autonomous defenseDictyostelium discoideumhost–pathogen interactionsmetal poisoningmononuclear phagocyte systemnutritional immunityphagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID29354124
PMCPMC5758549
OpenAlexW2781706726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.