ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017
SesI May Be Associated with the Invasiveness of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Battle royale: Immune response on biofilms - host-pathogen interactions.Current research in immunology · 2023Review
- Look Who's Talking: Host and Pathogen Drivers ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Virulence Factors in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Comparative genomics ofMicrobial genomics · 2021Article
- Improved diagnostic prediction of the pathogenicity of bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis.PloS one · 2021Article
- Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Contained in Gut Microbiota as a Primary Source of Sepsis in Low- and Very Low Birth Weight Neonates.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Overview of Staphylococcus epidermidis cell wall-anchored proteins: potential targets to inhibit biofilm formation.Molecular biology reports · 2020Review
- Surface Proteins ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.