ArticleKorean journal of radiology
Ultrasonographic Interval Changes in Solid Thyroid Nodules after Ultrasonography-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration.
Article in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Influencing the Sample Adequacy of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration from Solid Thyroid Nodules for Liquid-Based Cytology: A Demographic, Sonographic, and Technical Perspective.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Analysis of differences of ultrasound features in different courses of thyroid carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology Based on the Citation Frequency.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Ocular surface heat effects on ocular hemodynamics detected by real-time measuring device.International journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: None of the previous studies have investigated the interval change in ultrasonography (US) features of solid thyroid nodules (STNs) after US-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA). This study aimed to assess the prevalence and characteristics of US interval changes in STNs after US-FNA. Materials and Methods: This study included 257 STNs in 257 patients in whom thyroid US and initial US-FNA had been performed by two radiologists from January 2015 to June 2015. One of the radiologists performed single needle puncture in all cases, whereas the other radiologist used double or triple needle punctures. Follow-up US examinations were performed after 12.0 ± 6.0 months. We evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of post-FNA US interval changes through a retrospective analysis. In addition, multiple factors were correlated with post-FNA US interval changes. Results: The number of needle punctures was one (n = 91), two (n = 163), and three (n = 3). Of the 257 STNs (mean diameter, 11.9 mm) in 257 patients, 35 (13.6%) showed an interval change in US features on follow-up US. Among them, 17 STNs (6.6%) showed newly developed malignant US features, including hypoechogenicity (n = 5), microcalcifications (n = 2), a spiculated margin (n = 4), hypoechogenicity with a spiculated margin (n = 5), and microcalcifications with non-parallel orientation (n = 1). Between patients who showed presence and absence of US interval changes, there were no significant differences in patient age, sex, nodule size, dichotomization, and location, Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System categorization after FNA, practitioners involved, number of needle punctures, cytological findings, and interval between FNA and US follow-up ( Conclusion: Awareness of US interval changes after US-FNA of STNs may be helpful for the management of STNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.