Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29353986›Full record

ArticleJournal of offender rehabilitation2013

The Influence of Client Risks and Treatment Engagement on Recidivism.

Yang Yang, Kevin Knight, George W Joe, Grace A Rowan-Szal, Wayne E K Lehman, Patrick M Flynn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of offender rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang YangInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Kevin KnightInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
George W JoeInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Grace A Rowan-SzalInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Wayne E K LehmanInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Patrick M FlynnInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

Funding

Implementing and Sustaining Innovations in Criminal Justice-DATS 2 (TCU RC)U01DA016190 · NIDA · TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY · PI KNIGHT, KEVIN · 2002 to 2012
$6.9M
Sustainable HIV Risk Reduction Strategies for CJ Systems - Opioid Administrative SupplementR01DA025885 · NIDA · TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY · PI LEHMAN, WAYNE E.K. · 2008 to 2018
$5.9M
TRANSFERRING DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT AND ASSESSMENT RESOURCR01DA013093 · NIDA · TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY · PI FLYNN, PATRICK M · 1999 to 2014
$3.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013093NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025885NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA016190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study modeled 12 month post-release re-arrest (recidivism) in terms of pretreatment risk factors (i.e., criminal history, criminal thinking,) and during-treatment engagement in a sample of 653 subjects admitted to four prison-based substance treatment programs. Structural Equation Modeling was used to test during-treatment engagement as a mediator variable in explaining the relationship between the pretreatment risk factors and recidivism. Results indicated that (1) a long history of criminal conduct correlated with criminal thinking, which in turn had a significantly negative relationship with engagement in treatment; (2) the level of criminal involvement had a significant relationship with re-arrest, whereas the level of criminal thinking did not influence being re-arrested directly; (3) the relationship between criminal history and re-arrest was partially mediated by criminal thinking and treatment engagement, whereas the relationship between criminal thinking and re-arrest was fully mediated by treatment engagement. The findings suggest that it is important to design interventions targeting criminal thinking and monitor treatment engagement as an indicator of treatment performance. Clinical implications also include the importance of facilitating treatment engagement and the utility of conducting prognostic assessment to inform treatment.

Indexed as

criminal historycriminal thinkingrecidivismrisk factortreatment engagement

Identifiers

PMID29353986
PMCPMC5773110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.