Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29353552›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2018

Micronutrient powders to combat anaemia in young children: do they work?

Hans Verhoef, Emily Teshome, Andrew M Prentice

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hans VerhoefMRC Unit The Gambia, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, Gambia. hans.verhoef@icloud.com.
Emily TeshomeMRC Unit The Gambia, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, Gambia.
Andrew M PrenticeMRC Unit The Gambia, Atlantic Boulevard, Fajara, Gambia.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMRC Unit the Gambia · GM

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U123292699Medical Research Council MC_UU_00026/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended point-of-use fortification of complementary foods with iron-containing micronutrient powders to improve iron status and reduce anaemia in children at risk of anaemia. This recommendation continues to be debated. In a recent trial among Kenyan children aged 12-36 months, we found no evidence that daily point-of-use fortification was efficacious in improving haemoglobin concentration or plasma iron markers. An updated meta-analysis indicated that, on average, in an arbitrarily selected setting and with adherence as obtained under trial conditions, one may expect a small increase in haemoglobin concentration in preschool children, with the upper limit of the 95% CI virtually excluding an effect beyond 5.5 g/L. In the present paper, we elaborate on the interpretation of these findings and the meta-analyses that formed the basis for the WHO guidelines. In particular, we draw attention to the phenomenon that small group differences in the distribution of continuous outcomes (haemoglobin concentration, ferritin concentrations) can give a false impression of relatively large effects on the prevalence of the dichotomised outcomes (anaemia, iron deficiency).Please see related articles: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0839-z , https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0867-8.

Indexed as

AnemiaAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyDietary SupplementsFood, FortifiedHemoglobinsHumansKenyaMicronutrientsPowdersHemoglobinsMicronutrientsPowdersAnaemiaChildFe(III)-EDTAFoodFortifiedIronIron deficiencyMeta-analysisPreschool

Identifiers

PMID29353552
PMCPMC5776757
OpenAlexW2783520416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.