ArticleMedical education online2018
A progressive three-phase innovation to medical education in the United States.
Article in Medical education online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The learning preferences of millennial emergency medicine residents in Qatar.International journal of medical education · 2019Trial
- Assessing medical students' readiness for artificial intelligence after pre-clinical training.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Organ-System-Based Curriculum in Medical Education: A Scoping Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Review
- Understanding Health Care Students' Perceptions, Beliefs, and Attitudes Toward AI-Powered Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Precursor for Automation Bias?JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Among Otolaryngologists in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled decision support in nephrology.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022Review
- An observational study of an approach to accommodate a fourth-year to third-year neurology clerkship curricular transition.Medical education online · 2020Observational
- The importance of introducing artificial intelligence to the medical curriculum - assessing practitioners' perspectives.Croatian medical journal · 2020Article
- Introducing Artificial Intelligence Training in Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The practice of medicine has changed greatly over the past 100 years, yet the structure of undergraduate medical education has evolved very little. Many schools have modified their curricula to incorporate problem-based learning and organ systems-based curricula, but few schools have adequately addressed rising tuition costs. Undergraduate medical education has become cost-prohibitive for students interested in primary care. In the meanwhile, the concept of a separate dedicated intern year is outdated and mired in waste despite remaining a requirement for several hospital-based and surgical specialties. Described here is an innovative approach to medical education which reduces tuition costs and maximizes efficiency, based on principals already employed by several schools. This integrated curriculum, first suggested by the author in 2010, keeps the current USMLE system in place, exposes medical students to patient care earlier, expands and incorporates the 'intern' year into a four-year medical training program, provides more time for students to decide on a specialty, and allows residency programs to acquire fully-licensed practitioners with greater clinical experience than the status quo. ABBREVIATIONS: MCAT: Medical college admission test; USMLE: US medical licensing examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.