ReviewMolecular neurobiology2018
In Vivo Transient and Partial Cell Reprogramming to Pluripotency as a Therapeutic Tool for Neurodegenerative Diseases.
Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular senescence and aging: molecular mechanisms and convergent pathways.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Epigenetic brain reprogramming rejuvenates neuro-immune circuits to reverse Alzheimer's disease pathology and systemic bone loss.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- Review
- Partial Reprogramming in Senescent Schwann Cells Enhances Peripheral Nerve Regeneration via Restoration of Stress Granule Homeostasis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Review
- The interplay of cellular senescence and reprogramming shapes the biological landscape of aging and cancer revealing novel therapeutic avenues.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Cellular rejuvenation: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions for diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Reversine ameliorates hallmarks of cellular senescence in human skeletal myoblasts via reactivation of autophagy.Aging cell · 2023Article
- Induction of Nanog in neural progenitor cells for adaptive regeneration of ischemic brain.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2022Article
- Targeting PTB for Glia-to-Neuron Reprogramming In Vitro and In Vivo for Therapeutic Development in Neurological Diseases.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- MicroRNA‑29a promotes the neural differentiation of rat neural stem/progenitor cells by targeting KLF4.Molecular medicine reports · 2020Article
- Aging, Cellular Senescence, and Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020Review
- Aging: therapeutics for a healthy future.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020Review
- AAVvector-mediated in vivo reprogramming into pluripotency.Nature communications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In theory, human diseases in which a specific cell type degenerates, such as neurodegenerative diseases, can be therapeutically addressed by replacement of the lost cells. The classical strategy for cell replacement is exogenous cell transplantation, but now, cell replacement can also be achieved with in situ reprogramming. Indeed, many of these disorders are age-dependent, and "rejuvenating" strategies based on cell epigenetic modifications are a possible approach to counteract disease progression. In this context, transient and/or partial reprogramming of adult somatic cells towards pluripotency can be a promising tool for neuroregeneration. Temporary and controlled in vivo overexpression of Yamanaka reprogramming factors (Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM)) has been proven feasible in different experimental settings and could be employed to facilitate in situ tissue regeneration; this regeneration can be accomplished either by producing novel stem/precursor cells, without the challenges posed by exogenous cell transplantation, or by changing the epigenetic adult cell signature to the signature of a younger cell. The risk of this procedure resides in the possible lack of perfect control of the process, carrying a potential oncogenic or unexpected cell phenotype hazard. Recent studies have suggested that these limits can be overcome by a tightly controlled cyclic regimen of short-term OSKM expression in vivo that prevents full reprogramming to the pluripotent state and avoids both tumorigenesis and the presence of unwanted undifferentiated cells. On the other hand, this strategy can enhance tissue regeneration for therapeutic purposes in aging-related neurological diseases as well. These data could open the path to further research on the therapeutic potential of in vivo reprogramming in regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29353456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.