ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2019
Investigation of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Giant Panda Feces for Potential Probiotics In Vitro.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Insights Into the Probiotic and Safety Attributes of Pediococcus acidilactici BC-7 for its Potential Application in Livestock Health.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici strains isolated from cattle gut show probiotic potential.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Effects and Mechanisms of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum G83 on Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)-Induced Intestinal Inflammation.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Probiotic Characteristics and Whole Genome Analysis of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum PM8 from Giant Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) Milk.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluation of probiotic properties and complete genome analysis of lactic acid bacteria isolated from crested ibisFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- The giant panda gut harbors a high diversity of lactic acid bacteria revealed by a novel culturomics pipeline.mSystems · 2024Article
- Multi-functional Potential of Five Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Derived from Giant Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2023Article
- Optimization of bioprocess of Schleiferilactobacillus harbinensis Ca12 and its viability in frozen Brazilian berries (Açai, Euterpe oleracea Mart.).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021Article
- Lactobacillus plantarum BSGP201683 Improves the Intestinal Barrier of Giant Panda Microbiota-Associated Mouse Infected by Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021Article
- Gut Bacteria ofACS omega · 2021Article
- Diversity and Composition of Gut Bacterial Community in Giant Panda with Anorexia.Current microbiology · 2021Article
- Antimicrobial Activity ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- The Panda-DerivedFrontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study aimed to isolate an optimal lactic acid bacterial strain from the feces of healthy giant pandas. The strain exhibited good stability at low pH and high bile salt concentrations, activity against pathogens relevant to pandas, and antibiotic susceptibility. In the current study, 25 isolates were obtained from de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe agar. Two (E21 and G83) and eight (E1, E2, E16, E18, E21, E69, E70, and G83) isolates demonstrated good performance at pH 2.0 and bile 2% (w/v), respectively. Three isolates (G83, G88, and G90) possessed better antimicrobial effect on enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli CVCC196 (ETEC) than the rest. One isolate (G83) strongly affected Salmonella, whereas three (G83, G87, and G88) exhibited inhibitory activity against Staphylococcus aureus. All isolates were multi-drug resistant. These isolates were identified as Lactobacillus (5 isolates) and Enterococcus (20 isolates) by 16S rRNA sequencing. Virulence genes were detected in Enterococcus isolates. Isolate G83 was identified as Lactobacillus plantarum and was considered as the best probiotic candidate among all of the experimental isolates. This study provided necessary and important theoretical guidance for further experiments on G83 in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29353415What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.