ArticleJournal of nephrology2018
A STARD-compliant prediction model for diagnosing thrombotic microangiopathies.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deterioration in Clinical Status Is Not Enough to Suspend Eculizumab: A Genetic Complement-Mediated Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Case Report.Case reports in nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim of the study was the definition of a predictive model for the initial diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA). We retrospectively collected data on all adult patients admitted to the Gemelli Hospital from 2010 to 2014. ICD-9 codes from primary diagnoses were used for TMA diagnosis. Demographic and laboratory characteristics on admission of patients with TMA were then compared with a random sample of 500 patients with other diagnoses. The prediction model was externally validated in a cohort from another hospital. Overall, 23 of 187,183 patients admitted during the study period received a primary diagnosis of TMA. LDH (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05, 1.63) and platelets (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94, 0.98) were the only independent predictors of TMA. The AUROC of the final model including only LDH and platelets was 0.96 (95% CI 0.91, 1.00). The Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test (p = 0.54) suggested good calibration. Our model also confirmed good discriminatory power (AUROC 0.72 95% CI 0.60, 0.84) and calibration (HL test p = 0.52) in the validation sample. We present a simple prediction model for use in diagnosing TMA in hospitalized patients. The model performs well and can help clinicians to identify patients at high risk of TMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29353400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.