Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29353369›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2019

Mental health professionals' attitudes towards mental illness: professional and cultural factors in the INTER NOS study.

Francisco Del Olmo-Romero, María González-Blanco, Salvador Sarró, Jaime Grácio, Manuel Martín-Carrasco, Ana C Martinez-Cabezón, Giampaolo Perna, Edith Pomarol-Clotet, Pedro Varandas, Javier Ballesteros-Rodríguez and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Francisco Del Olmo-RomeroComplejo Asistencial Benito Menni and Clínica San Miguel, Sisters Hospitallers, Madrid, Spain.
María González-BlancoMiniresidencia Aravaca, Línea de Rehabilitación, Sisters Hospitallers, Madrid, Spain.
Salvador SarróFIDMAG Research Foundation, Sisters Hospitallers, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-2189
Jaime GrácioClínica Psiquiátrica de S. José, Sisters Hospitallers, Lisbon, Portugal.
Manuel Martín-CarrascoCIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3861-7589
Ana C Martinez-CabezónCentro De Día Villaverde, Línea De Rehabilitación, Sisters Hospitallers, Madrid, Spain.
Giampaolo PernaVila San Benedetto, Sisters Hospitallers, Albese con Casano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-0785
Edith Pomarol-ClotetFIDMAG Research Foundation, Sisters Hospitallers, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8159-8563
Pedro VarandasClínica Psiquiátrica de S. José, Sisters Hospitallers, Lisbon, Portugal.
Javier Ballesteros-RodríguezCIBERSAM (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6713-1916
Carlos Rebolleda-GilCentro De Rehabilitacion Psicosocial Aranjuez, Línea De Rehabilitación, Sisters Hospitallers, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7284-1851
Giovanna VanniVila San Benedetto, Sisters Hospitallers, Albese con Casano, Italy.
Eduardo González-FraileCochrane Associated Group UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain. eduardo.gonzalez@unir.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9381-3358
INTER NOS group
Fidmag Sisters Hospitallers · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ESChampalimaud Foundation · PTUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch shows that personnel working in mental health facilities may share some of the societal prejudices towards mental illness. This might result in stigmatizing behaviours towards people suffering from mental disorders, undermining the quality of their care.

aimsTo describe and compare attitudes towards mental illness across a sample of professionals working in a wide range of mental health facilities in Spain, Portugal and Italy.

methodWe administered a survey to personnel including two questionnaires related to stigmatizing attitudes: The Community Attitudes toward the Mentally Ill (CAMI) and the Attribution Questionnaire (AQ-27). Data were compared according to professional category, work setting and country.

results34.06% (1525) professionals of the surveyed population responded adequately. Psychologists and social therapists had the most positive attitudes, and nursing assistants the most negative, on most factors of CAMI and AQ-27. Community staff had more positive attitudes than hospital-based professionals in most factors on CAMI and in discriminatory responses on AQ-27.

conclusionsGlobally, mental health professionals showed a positive attitude towards mental illness, but also a relative support to coercive treatments. There are differences in attitudes modulated by professional category and setting. Results can guide preventive strategies, particularly for the hospital-based and nursing staff.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelMental DisordersMental Health ServicesSocial StigmaStereotypingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPersonnel, HospitalPortugalSpainHealth personnel attitudeMental health professionalsMental illnessSocial distanceStigma

Identifiers

PMID29353369
OpenAlexW2790887996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.