SynthesisCurrent heart failure reports2018
Frailty Assessment in Heart Failure: an Overview of the Multi-domain Approach.
Synthesis in Current heart failure reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Frailty Syndrome on Early and Midterm Adverse Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Observational
- Frailty in acute coronary syndrome: From risk stratification to clinical decision-making.World journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Prognostic impact of multi-domain approaches and the Tilburg frailty indicator in elderly patients with heart failure.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- A patient with heart failure, who is frail: How does this affect therapeutic decisions?Cardiology journal · 2023Review
- Employing the Multivariate Edmonton Scale in the Assessment of Frailty Syndrome in Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical characteristics and frailty status in heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- Machine Learning-Based Personalized Risk Prediction Model for Mortality of Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Surgery: The PRIME Score.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Association of frailty with in-hospital outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Multidimensional Approach to Frailty.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- Frailty in Heart Failure: Implications for Management.Cardiac failure review · 2018Review
- Heart Failure and Frailty in the Community-Living Elderly Population: What the UFO Study Will Tell Us.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe study aims (1) to provide a contemporary description of frailty assessment in heart failure and (2) to provide an overview of multi-domain frailty assessment in heart failure. RECENT
findingsFrailty assessment is an important predictive measure for mortality and hospitalisation in individuals with heart failure. To date, there are no frailty assessment instruments validated for use in heart failure. This has resulted in significant heterogeneity between studies regarding the assessment of frailty. The most common frailty assessment instrument used in heart failure is the Frailty Phenotype which focuses on five physical domains of frailty; the appropriateness a purely physical measure of frailty in individuals with heart failure who frequently experience decreased exercise tolerance and shortness of breath is yet to be determined. A limited number of studies have approached frailty assessment using a multi-domain view which may be more clinically relevant in heart failure. There remains a lack of consensus regarding frailty assessment and an absence of a validated instrument in heart failure. Despite this, frailty continues to be assessed frequently, primarily for research purposes, using predominantly physical frailty measures. A more multidimensional view of frailty assessment using a multi-domain approach will likely be more sensitive to identifying at risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.