Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29353332›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2018

First-line chemotherapy with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched study.

Akitaka Makiyama, Kenji Kunieda, Masaaki Noguchi, Takeshi Kajiwara, Takao Tamura, Koji Takeda, Junko Sugiyama, Keiko Minashi, Toshikazu Moriwaki, Naotoshi Sugimoto and 25 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Systemic therapy strategies for elderly patients with gastric cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Achieving sequential therapy in advanced gastric cancer: the importance of appropriate patient management for the elderly and/or those with ascites.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Akitaka MakiyamaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Kyushu Hospital, 1-8-1 Kishinoura, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu, 806-8501, Japan. makiyama20@hotmail.com.
Kenji KuniedaDepartment of GI Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Masaaki NoguchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Takeshi KajiwaraDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Takao TamuraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Koji TakedaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Junko SugiyamaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tonan Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Keiko MinashiClinical Trial Promotion Department, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Toshikazu MoriwakiDivision of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Naotoshi SugimotoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Michitaka NagaseDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Nagoya Red-Cross Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yuji NegoroDivision of Gastroenterological Medicine, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan.
Takashi TsudaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Hideki ShimodairaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Naohiro OkanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihito TsujiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
Daisuke SakaiDepartment of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhiro YanagiharaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Shinya UedaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nara Hospital Kindai University School of Medicine, Ikoma, Japan.
Shingo TamuraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, Beppu, Japan.
Satoshi OtsuDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Yufu, Japan.
Takuya HondaDepartment of Clinical Oncology Center, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yuzo MatsushitaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hamanomachi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tatsuya OkunoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Tomomi KashiwadaDivision of Hematology, Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Akira NozakiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Masahide EbiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkudaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Mototsugu ShimokawaCancer Biostatistics Laboratory, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shuichi HironakaClinical Trial Promotion Department, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
Ichinosuke HyodoDivision of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Eishi BabaDepartment of Comprehensive Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Narikazu BokuDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei MuroDepartment of Clinical Oncology and Outpatient Treatment Center, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Taito EsakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Chiba Cancer Center · JPKindai University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPAichi Medical University · JPHamanomachi Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital · JPKagawa University Hospital · JPKansai Electric Power Hospital · JPKeiyukai Sapporo Hospital · JPKobe University · JPKyorin University · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPKyushu Hospital · JPKyushu University · JPKyushu University Beppu Hospital · JPNagasaki University Hospital · JPOita University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoropyrimidine and platinum combination is the standard treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). However, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is commonly used for elderly patients with AGC because of its good tolerability.

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, we collected clinical data of AGC patients aged 70 years or older, treated with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as the first-line treatment between January 2009 and December 2011. Propensity score matched cohorts (PSMC) were used for reducing the confounding effects to compare efficacy and safety between the two treatment groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to clarify the prognostic factors.

resultsPSMC (n = 109 in each group) were selected from among 444 eligible patients (S-1 group, 210; SP group, 234); the S-1 group included more patients deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy than the SP group (e.g., higher age, poorer PS, poor renal function). In the PSMC, patients' characteristics were comparable between groups, except the male ratio (S-1 group, 64.2%; SP group, 77.1%; p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in either overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, p = 0.63] or progression-free survival (HR 1.09, p = 0.61). Severe adverse events (AEs) and hospitalization due to AEs were more frequent in the SP group than in the S-1 group (p < 0.001 each).

conclusionOur findings do not support the survival benefit of SP over S-1 in elderly patients with AGC. We are now conducting a prospective comparative study to optimize treatment strategy and explore applicability of the geriatric assessment for these patients.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisOxonic AcidPropensity ScoreStomach NeoplasmsTegafurTreatment OutcomeCisplatinDrug CombinationsOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)TegafurCisplatinElderly patientsGastric cancerPropensity score matching method (3-5 words)S-1

Identifiers

PMID29353332
OpenAlexW2793464091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.