Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29353056›Full record

ArticleGene2018

Interspecific studies of circadian genes period and timeless in Drosophila.

Shumaila Noreen, Mirko Pegoraro, Faisal Nouroz, Eran Tauber, Charalambos P Kyriacou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Model and Non-model Insects in Chronobiology.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shumaila NoreenDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, United Kingdom; Molecular Genetics Lab, Department of Zoology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan. Electronic address: shumailanoreen@uop.edu.pk.
Mirko PegoraroDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Faisal NourozDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Eran TauberDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, United Kingdom; Department of Evolutionary & Environmental Biology, The Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Charalambos P KyriacouDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
University of Leicester · GBUniversity of Haifa · ILUniversity of Peshawar · PK

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G02085X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J005169/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The level of rescue of clock function in genetically arrhythmic Drosophila melanogaster hosts using interspecific clock gene transformation was used to study the putative intermolecular coevolution between interacting clock proteins. Among them PER and TIM are the two important negative regulators of the circadian clock feedback loop. We transformed either the D. pseudoobscura per or tim transgenes into the corresponding arrhythmic D. melanogaster mutant (per01 or tim01) and observed >50% rhythmicity but the period of activity rhythm was either longer (D. pseudoobscura-per) or shorter than 24 h (D. pseudoobscura-tim) compared to controls. By introducing both transgenes simultaneously into double mutants, we observed that the period of the activity rhythm was rescued by the pair of hemizygous transgenes (~24 h). These flies also showed a more optimal level of temperature compensation for the period. Under LD 12:12 these flies have a D. pseudoobscura like activity profile with the absence of morning anticipation as well as a very prominent earlier evening peak of activity rhythm. These observation are consistent with the view that TIM and PER form a heterospecific coevolved module at least for the circadian period of activity rhythms. However the strength of rhythmicity was reduced by having both transgenes present, so while evidence for a coevolution between PER and TIM is observed for some characters it is not for others.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCircadian RhythmDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGenetic Complementation TestMotor ActivityMutationPeriod Circadian ProteinsPhylogenySpecies SpecificityTemperatureTime FactorsDrosophila ProteinsPeriod Circadian ProteinsPER protein, Drosophilatim protein, DrosophilaCircadian rhythmsCoevolutionD. pseudoobscuraDrosophilaPeriodTimeless

Identifiers

PMID29353056
PMCPMC5818170
OpenAlexW2790376227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.